Closed ended tube resonance problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the resonance of a closed-ended tube, specifically a 3 m long aluminum bar resonating at a frequency of 1200 Hz. The initial calculation of wavelength using the formula L = n/4λ yielded a wavelength of 12 m, resulting in a wave velocity of 14400 m/s. However, upon reevaluation, it was determined that the correct expression for L should be L = n/2λ, leading to a revised length of 6 m and a more plausible wave velocity of 7200 m/s. This adjustment aligns with the physical properties of aluminum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and resonance
  • Familiarity with the wave equation v = fλ
  • Knowledge of standing wave patterns in tubes
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of standing waves in open and closed tubes
  • Learn about the physical properties of sound waves in different materials
  • Explore the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and wave speed in various mediums
  • Investigate the effects of temperature and material properties on sound velocity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, acoustics, and resonance phenomena in materials.

AbsoluteZer0
Messages
124
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



In class a 3 m long aluminum bar was made to resonate by clamping it at a node in the centre of the bar. The frequency heard was 1200Hz.


Homework Equations



L = \frac{n}{4}\lambda

v = f\lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



Knowing that L is 3, we can substitute this into the formula and solve accordingly in order to find wavelength:

3 = \frac{1}{4}\lambda
(4)(3) = \lambda

Which gives us 12m. We can then use the wave equation, substituting 12 and 1200

v = f\lambda
v =(1200)(12)

to arrive at 14400 m s^-1

However, I am lead to believe that I am possibly wrong due to the relatively high value of velocity that I found. Am I wrong? If so, where is my mistake?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What must be at each end of the rod - a node or an antinode? Rethink the expression for ##L## in terms of ##\lambda##.
 
TSny said:
What must be at each end of the rod - a node or an antinode? Rethink the expression for ##L## in terms of ##\lambda##.

I believe an antinode at each end, making it an open ended tube.

L = \frac{n}{2}\lambda

L is therefore 6 m, and velocity is therefore 7200 m s-1

Is this correct?

Thanks,
 
Yes, that looks right to me. (According to a quick check on the internet, 7200 m/s is somewhat high for aluminum. But that's what your data gives.)
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K