Closed form solution for large eigenvalues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the closed form solution for large eigenvalues, specifically addressing the equation $$\tan\lambda_n = \frac{1}{\lambda_n}$$. It establishes that for large eigenvalues, the values approach $\lambda_n = \pi k$ where $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$ and $k > 15$. The conversation seeks a more systematic method to determine the optimal $k$ without arbitrary selection, emphasizing that as $k$ increases, the approximation of $\lambda_n \approx k\pi$ improves significantly, particularly for large positive or negative values of $\lambda_n$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalue problems in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of asymptotic analysis in mathematical approximations
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for determining eigenvalues in large matrices
  • Explore the implications of asymptotic approximations in numerical analysis
  • Study the behavior of trigonometric functions in relation to eigenvalue equations
  • Investigate the use of numerical algorithms for eigenvalue computation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in computational mathematics, particularly those focusing on eigenvalue problems and numerical methods for large systems.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The eigenvalues are found by
$$
\tan\lambda_n = \frac{1}{\lambda_n}
$$
For large eigenvalues, the intersection get closer and closer to $\lambda_n = \pi k$ where $k\in\mathbb{Z}^+$ and $k > 15$.
Is this correct? Without arbitrary picking a $k$, is there a better way to determine a $k$ for when $\lambda\to\pi k$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
The eigenvalues are found by
$$
\tan\lambda_n = \frac{1}{\lambda_n}
$$
For large eigenvalues, the intersection get closer and closer to $\lambda_n = \pi k$ where $k\in\mathbb{Z}^+$ and $k > 15$.
Is this correct? Without arbitrary picking a $k$, is there a better way to determine a $k$ for when $\lambda\to\pi k$?

\[\tan\lambda_n = \frac{1}{\lambda_n}\]

\[\Rightarrow \lambda_n=k\pi+\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{\lambda_n}\mbox{ where }k\in\mathbb{Z}\]

For large positive or negative values of \(\lambda_n\), \(\tan^{-1}\frac{1}{\lambda_n}\approx 0\)

\[\therefore \lambda_n\approx k\pi\mbox{ where }k\in\mathbb{Z}\]

The larger \(k\) value you use the approximation will be better. Choosing a bound for \(k\) depends on the accuracy that you need for your approximation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
26K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K