Closest line from a point to a curve in R^2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the closest point on a parametrized curve in R² to a fixed point, and demonstrating that the line connecting these two points is perpendicular to the curve at the closest point. The subject area includes concepts from calculus and geometry, particularly involving curves and optimization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the geometric interpretation of perpendicularity and the mathematical definition involving dot products. There is discussion about the uniqueness of the closest point and the conditions under which it exists. Some participants question how to apply the concept of minimizing distances and the implications of the curve's smoothness.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the definitions of perpendicularity and the conditions necessary for finding the closest point. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of derivatives to minimize the distance, although there is still exploration of the underlying assumptions and methods.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of the smoothness of the curve and the potential non-uniqueness of the closest point. Additionally, the discussion touches on the implications of the parameter interval not being compact, which may affect the existence of a closest point.

RBG
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Given a parametrized curve ##X(t):I\to\mathbb{R}^2## I am trying to show given a fixed point ##p##, and the closest point on ##X## to ##p##, ##X(t_0)##, the line between the point and the curve is perpendicular to the curve. My only idea so far is to show that ##(p-X(t))\cdot(\frac{X'(t)}{||X'(t)||})=0##. But in general, I don't see why this would be true? It seems clear geometrically, but obviously that's not an argument. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the definition of "perpendicular".
 
Simon Bridge said:
Use the definition of "perpendicular".

Isn't that the dot product is zero? That or that the slopes of the tangent lines are inverse reciprocals of one another. But I don't see how the latter definition can be applied...
 
Dot products of what?
How can a line be perpendicular to a curve?
 
RBG said:
the closest point on ##X## to ##p##
I take it that you assume the curve is smooth. Even then, note that the closest point may not be unique. Also, when ##I## is not compact, a closest point is not guaranteed to exist, as ##t \mapsto \|p - X(t)\|## need not assume its infimum over ##I## then.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Dot products of what?
How can a line be perpendicular to a curve?

Dot product of the tangent vector, right? So above ##(p-X(t_0))## is the vector between point and curve and ##X'(t_0)## is the tangent vector. But I don't see why should ##p\dot X'(t_0)-X(t_0)X'(t_0)=0##
 
... given a point on the curve, how would you tell that it is the closest point?
Given the curve C and a point P, how would you usually go about finding the closest point on C to P?
 
Krylov said:
I take it that you assume the curve is smooth. Even then, note that the closest point may not be unique. Also, when ##I## is not compact, a closest point is not guaranteed to exist.

We are assuming ##X(t)## is a regular parametrized curve and ##t_0## is not an endpoint of ##I##.
 
RBG said:
Dot product of the tangent vector, right? So above ##(p-X(t_0))## is the vector between point and curve and ##X'(t_0)## is the tangent vector. But I don't see why should ##p\dot X'(t_0)-X(t_0)X'(t_0)=0##
... why not just work through the expression that arises from the definition you just used?
 
  • #10
Simon Bridge said:
... given a point on the curve, how would you tell that it is the closest point?
Given the curve C and a point P, how would you usually go about finding the closest point on C to P?

You would take the derivative of ##||p-X(t)||## and minimize it. Then check which points are minimal, right?
 
  • #11
RBG said:
You would take the derivative of ##||p-X(t)||## and minimize it. Then check which points are minimal, right?

That is how I would do it, but I would make the problem easier by minimizing ##|| p - X(t)||^2 ## instead of ##||p - X(t)||##. These problems are equivalent, in the sense that their ##t##-solutions are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Simon Bridge
  • #12
Simon Bridge said:
... why not just work through the expression that arises from the definition you just used?
I really don't understand what you mean by this. I should use the fact that I am minimizing ##|p-X(t)||## somehow to reduce the dot product?
 
  • #13
RBG said:
I really don't understand what you mean by this. I should use the fact that I am minimizing ##|p-X(t)||## somehow to reduce the dot product?
OOOOOOHHHHH... duh. Nevermind. Right... Thanks! Just do the calculation of taking the derivative
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K