CMB fluctuations and large scale fluctuations nowadays do not match ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the apparent discrepancy between cosmic microwave background (CMB) fluctuations and current large-scale density fluctuations in the universe. Participants explore the implications of linear perturbation theory and the behavior of density fluctuations over time, particularly in relation to voids and non-linear effects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that CMB dark matter density fluctuations are approximately d_rho/rho ~ 10^-5, while linear perturbation theory predicts they should be around d_rho/rho ~ 10^-2 today, leading to a significant disagreement with observed fluctuations of order d_rho/rho ~ 1 in voids.
  • Another participant suggests that the large-scale behavior is well-predicted by linear perturbation theory, with significant divergence occurring only at small scales, and proposes that the original poster may have incorrect input numbers or misunderstandings about scaling.
  • A different participant emphasizes their focus on void scales and argues that the density contrast within voids and their walls indicates they are entering the non-linear regime, but questions the ability of non-linear effects to account for the observed discrepancies.
  • One participant later corrects their earlier claim about the density fluctuations at last scattering, stating that the correct value is around 0.06, attributing their previous error to using an incorrect formula related to the wave vector.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a lack of consensus, with some participants questioning the validity of the original claims while others defend their observations. There are competing views regarding the applicability of linear perturbation theory and the interpretation of density fluctuations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correct values and formulas for density fluctuations, highlighting potential dependencies on definitions and assumptions about the scale of perturbations.

smallphi
Messages
436
Reaction score
2
CMB fluctuations and large scale fluctuations nowadays do not match ?

The CMB dark matter density fluctuations for big scales is d_rho/rho~ 10^-5 and lower.
The scale factor increased ~ 1000 times from last scattering to now.
Linear perturbation theory predicts that the density fluctuations today would be ~ 1000 times what they were at last scattering i.e. d_rho/rho ~ 10^-2 today.

That is in obvious disagreement with what we observe since density fluctuations on scales of voids for example suggest fluctuations of order d_rho/rho ~ 1. This is two orders of magnitudes off the suggested value from linear perturbation theory and such big scales like voids just entered the non-linear regime so the explanation it's nonlinear effect is not plausable.

So what is the explanation of that?
 
Space news on Phys.org


smallphi said:
The CMB dark matter density fluctuations for big scales is d_rho/rho~ 10^-5 and lower.
The scale factor increased ~ 1000 times from last scattering to now.
Linear perturbation theory predicts that the density fluctuations today would be ~ 1000 times what they were at last scattering i.e. d_rho/rho ~ 10^-2 today.

That is in obvious disagreement with what we observe since density fluctuations on scales of voids for example suggest fluctuations of order d_rho/rho ~ 1. This is two orders of magnitudes off the suggested value from linear perturbation theory and such big scales like voids just entered the non-linear regime so the explanation it's nonlinear effect is not plausable.

So what is the explanation of that?
I'd have to break out my old cosmology texts to be sure, but I don't believe there is any such problem when you look at it in detail. Everything I've seen in cosmology talks and whatnot indicates that the large-scale behavior is predicted extremely well with linear perturbation theory. It is only at small scales that things start to diverge significantly, and even then the divergence can be largely fixed with some semi-analytic approximations.

So I suspect one of three things could be the case:
1. You've got the wrong input numbers.
2. Your understanding of how d_rho/rho scales with expansion is off (I don't remember offhand what it is).
3. You're mistaking the expected output from linear perturbation theory with the observed d_rho/rho that results after non-linear behavior is taken into account.
 


I'm interested in void scales, d ~ 60Mpc.
The only number that might be wrong is d_rho/rho ~ 10^-5 at last scattering but not very probable - I checked it already with semianalytical formulas. In linear regime, the growing perturbation mode in matter dominated universe is proportional to the scale factor so the perturbation grew about 1100 times since last scattering.

The void scales currently have density contrast ~-1 inside the void and ~1.5 in the dense walls, so they are just getting into nonlinear regimes. Nonlinear effects cannot provide two orders of magnitude increase over the linear regime so soon.
 


I got it finally.

The delta_rho/rho of dark matter for that scale is around 0.06 at last scattering.
I was using wrong formula for it since I took for the wave vector k= Pi/60 when I should have taken k=1/60 Mpc which puts it in a different case formula.
 


smallphi said:
I got it finally.

The delta_rho/rho of dark matter for that scale is around 0.06 at last scattering.
I was using wrong formula for it since I took for the wave vector k= Pi/60 when I should have taken k=1/60 Mpc which puts it in a different case formula.
Ah, okay, that makes sense. Sorry I wasn't more help, as I haven't worked with structure formation in a number of years.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K