CMB Radiation from Big Bang? Why not dark energy?

In summary, the CMB is uniform because the energy density of the early universe was uniform. The creation of the CMB was a primordial event; dark energy -- if it exists -- came to dominate the energy density only 'recently'. However, if the smoothness and uniformity of the primordial universe was prepared by inflation, than there is a connection between the uniformity of the CMB and the uniformity of the stuff that drove the inflationary expansion.
  • #1
ericosg
2
0
just to interesting not to share.

http://bit.ly/g6sFMh

i posted a question there which i wish to post also here, and get some insight.

why is this CMB uniform and dark energy and/or dark matter so uniformly spread and are not directly related? i.e. why aren't we saying that the CMB is emitted from the dark energy as a form of dark radiation of which a certain amount isn't dark at all? and thus why are we stating that it emmited from the big bang since it's clearly still around and not a wave. It's growth would then have to be closely tied to the expansion of the universe itself, otherwise it would disappear and not just reduce in intensity.

--

my apologies if this should have been posted under cosmology, etc.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Where to start. The link you posted is to a story about Roger Penrose's ideas on Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. This was in the news sometime last year, and since then the circular patterns claimed to have been seen in the CMB have been shown to be just statistical fluctuations. So Penrose's theory has no evidence to support it at present.

Secondly the CMB was not emitted from the Big Bang, It was emitted in the early universe, about 350,000 yrs after the big bang, at a time when the universe had cooled enough for protons and electrons to deionize and form hydrogen atoms, making things transparent. It consists of photons emitted from normal matter the usual way and certainly has nothing to do with "dark radiation from dark matter."

It's quite uniform because the universe was initially quite compact and experienced a period of extremely rapid expansion known as inflation.
 
  • #3
Bill_K said:
... and experienced a period of extremely rapid expansion known as inflation.

Or not :-)
 
  • #4
Thank you for such a quick and clear response!

I'm thrilled I found a forum such as this and people like you! :-)
 
  • #5
bcrowell said:
Or not :-)


Ben do you have a different view on the inflation error? oops I mean era..
 
  • #6
The CMB is uniform because the energy density of the early universe was uniform. The creation of the CMB was a primordial event; dark energy -- if it exists -- came to dominate the energy density only 'recently'. These two phenomena are therefore not directly connected.

However, if the smoothness and uniformity of the primordial universe was prepared by inflation, than there is a connection between the uniformity of the CMB and the uniformity of the stuff that drove the inflationary expansion. That stuff would likely have been very much like dark energy -- a smooth energy component with negative pressure.
 
  • #7
Perhaps uniformity and smoothness at last scattering could be explained by the gas having had enough time to reach thermal equilibrium before beginning expansion?

Or perhaps the process of expansion not only cooled the universe but also had the effect of smoothing out temperature differences? Perhaps hotter areas expanded slightly faster than colder areas?
 
  • #8
Tanelorn said:
Perhaps uniformity and smoothness at last scattering could be explained by the gas having had enough time to reach thermal equilibrium before beginning expansion?
Aha! Good question. This is a very important point regarding the uniformity of the CMB and motivates what's called the Horizon Problem. The size of the causal horizon at the time of last scattering subtended an angle of about 1 degree on the sky today; the present-day CMB sky has a volume [itex]10^{88}[/itex] times larger than a causal volume at last scattering. Of course, equilibrium could only be achieved within a single causal volume, since equilibrating processes are limited by the speed of light. And so the problem is thus: the present day horizon volume is highly uniform and isotropic, and, yet, it is comprised of myriad causally disconnected regions.

Or perhaps the process of expansion not only cooled the universe but also had the effect of smoothing out temperature differences? Perhaps hotter areas expanded slightly faster than colder areas?
This process would not solve the Horizon Process simply because the distance scales are so vast as to preclude any dynamical equilibration. Cosmic inflation was devised to address the horizon problem and does so by postulating that the early universe underwent a period of exponential expansion. A causal patch in the early universe was stretched and amplified to a scale surpassing our present day horizon volume. The field that drove inflation would have been correlated and uniform across this region; its subsequent decay products would have shared this uniformity. The radiation emitted in this decay process is the CMB -- uniform and isotropic across the present-day horizon.
 

1. What is CMB radiation and how does it relate to the Big Bang?

CMB radiation, or Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, is the residual heat and light left over from the Big Bang. It is the oldest light in the universe, dating back to about 380,000 years after the Big Bang when the universe became transparent. As the universe expanded and cooled, this light stretched into the microwave range, which is why it is called CMB radiation.

2. How is CMB radiation evidence for the Big Bang?

The existence of CMB radiation is a key piece of evidence for the Big Bang theory. It is predicted by the theory and has been observed by various telescopes and instruments, including NASA's Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and the European Space Agency's Planck satellite. The pattern and distribution of CMB radiation across the sky also supports the idea that the universe began with a big explosion, as predicted by the Big Bang theory.

3. Can CMB radiation tell us anything about the early universe?

Yes, CMB radiation carries valuable information about the early universe, specifically about its temperature and density. By studying the minute variations in the temperature of the CMB radiation, scientists can learn about the distribution of matter and energy in the early universe and how it evolved over time. This can help us better understand the processes that led to the formation of galaxies and other structures in the universe.

4. What is the role of dark energy in the expansion of the universe and CMB radiation?

Dark energy is a mysterious force that is thought to be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. While CMB radiation is a remnant of the early universe, dark energy is believed to be a current force shaping the expansion of the universe. It is not directly related to CMB radiation, but it does play a crucial role in our understanding of the universe and its evolution.

5. Is there a relationship between CMB radiation and the cosmic microwave background?

Yes, CMB radiation and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are two terms used interchangeably to refer to the same phenomenon. CMB radiation is a more accurate term, as it describes the nature of the radiation, while cosmic microwave background refers to the observable background glow of microwave light that fills the universe. Both terms are commonly used in scientific literature and discussions about the early universe and the Big Bang theory.

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
890
Back
Top