CNN is a reliable and neutral source?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutral Source
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the reliability and neutrality of CNN as a news source, exploring whether its coverage is balanced and independent. Participants also compare CNN to other news organizations, particularly Fox News, and discuss broader implications of media ownership and bias.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that there is no such thing as a completely neutral and reliable news source, suggesting that CNN is as reliable as other news organizations.
  • Others propose that CNN excels in its coverage of science and technology compared to its competitors.
  • One participant expresses a belief that CNN is more balanced than Fox News, which they characterize as having a right-wing bias.
  • Concerns are raised about the influence of corporate ownership on CNN's impartiality, with references to Time Warner's political donations and meetings with Republican lawmakers.
  • Some participants challenge the notion that Fox News provides factual reporting, suggesting it lacks scientific coverage and is more focused on entertainment.
  • There is a discussion about the credibility of sources, with references to specific articles and statements made by political figures.
  • One participant mentions their preference for gathering information from the Internet and cites various commentators who they believe provide well-cited information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the reliability and neutrality of CNN and other news sources, with multiple competing views presented regarding media bias and the quality of reporting.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific incidents and ownership structures that may influence media reporting, but these points remain unresolved and are subject to interpretation.

Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.
 
Ratzinger said:
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?

Well... In my opinion, CNN is much more balanced than the "Fair and Balanced" Network.

I think the Fox Slogan is short for "We give a FAIR Right Wing assessment, AND our anchors are mentally BALANCED"
 
Tide said:
There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.

Well on Fox, they do not air science because it is full of "just theories" not "facts", and movie stars provide a much better escape than boring science.
 
CG,

Yes, that is a definite shortcoming of FNC.
 
i don't think we should talk about cnn but of his mother company which is AOL-

Time Warner
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner.asp
Time Warner Corporate Timeline
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner-timeline.asp

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=19&media_outlet_id=9
http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/outlets/cnn


TIME-WARNER TBS - AOL donated 1.6 million to GW's 2000 campaign


examples:

CNN, Fox tout ABC/Post poll showing increase in Bush approval ratings, ignore own polls showing no improvement or a decrease
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512210002

CNN Says Focus on Civilian Casualties Would Be "Perverse"
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1670

Early this month, new CNN chairman Walter Isaacson met with top Republican lawmakers in Washington, D.C. to discuss how to improve relations between the cable news network and conservative Republicans.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1677


"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one."

The Mass Media & Politics: An Analysis of Influence
http://progressiveliving.org/mass_media_and_politics.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How much to Al Gore?

Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.
 
ComputerGeek said:
How much to Al Gore?
Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.

Anyway, that shows they are not impartial, non partisan, and objective..
 
Last edited:
  • #10
  • #11
So what is a good source?
 
  • #13
moose said:
The fact was that Bush said it, not the actual statement. !
i know. i know, but it's kind of tricky and funny. that is why i put the :smile: :smile:

Anyway, delete it if you want, i don't want to trash te thread...
 
  • #14
Well.. I do not watch Cable news.. I use the Internet to gather my information... I have more access to in-depth reporting, both opinions, and discussion, allowing me to formulate an opinion...

I also listen to Al Franken and Randi Rhoads, and The Majority Report because they CITE their information and use news reports not editorials when establishing facts in a situation. (Al is my high Brow, Randi is my Medium Brow and TMR is a nice mix of medium to low brow (depending on Sam's mood)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
527
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K