News CNN is a reliable and neutral source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutral Source
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the reliability and neutrality of CNN as a news source. Participants express skepticism about the existence of a completely neutral and reliable media outlet, suggesting that CNN is as dependable as other news organizations. A notable strength of CNN is highlighted: its superior coverage of science and technology compared to competitors, particularly Fox News, which is criticized for neglecting scientific topics in favor of entertainment. The conversation also touches on the influence of corporate ownership on media impartiality, referencing Time Warner's past political contributions and interactions with Republican lawmakers. Some participants advocate for alternative news sources and emphasize the importance of in-depth reporting and citation of information in forming opinions. Overall, the thread reflects a broader debate about media bias and the challenges of finding trustworthy news.
Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.
 
Ratzinger said:
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?

Well... In my opinion, CNN is much more balanced than the "Fair and Balanced" Network.

I think the Fox Slogan is short for "We give a FAIR Right Wing assessment, AND our anchors are mentally BALANCED"
 
Tide said:
There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.

Well on Fox, they do not air science because it is full of "just theories" not "facts", and movie stars provide a much better escape than boring science.
 
CG,

Yes, that is a definite shortcoming of FNC.
 
i don't think we should talk about cnn but of his mother company which is AOL-

Time Warner
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner.asp
Time Warner Corporate Timeline
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner-timeline.asp

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=19&media_outlet_id=9
http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/outlets/cnn


TIME-WARNER TBS - AOL donated 1.6 million to GW's 2000 campaign


examples:

CNN, Fox tout ABC/Post poll showing increase in Bush approval ratings, ignore own polls showing no improvement or a decrease
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512210002

CNN Says Focus on Civilian Casualties Would Be "Perverse"
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1670

Early this month, new CNN chairman Walter Isaacson met with top Republican lawmakers in Washington, D.C. to discuss how to improve relations between the cable news network and conservative Republicans.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1677


"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one."

The Mass Media & Politics: An Analysis of Influence
http://progressiveliving.org/mass_media_and_politics.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How much to Al Gore?

Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.
 
ComputerGeek said:
How much to Al Gore?
Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.

Anyway, that shows they are not impartial, non partisan, and objective..
 
Last edited:
  • #10
  • #11
So what is a good source?
 
  • #13
moose said:
The fact was that Bush said it, not the actual statement. !
i know. i know, but it's kind of tricky and funny. that is why i put the :smile: :smile:

Anyway, delete it if you want, i don't want to trash te thread...
 
  • #14
Well.. I do not watch Cable news.. I use the Internet to gather my information... I have more access to in-depth reporting, both opinions, and discussion, allowing me to formulate an opinion...

I also listen to Al Franken and Randi Rhoads, and The Majority Report because they CITE their information and use news reports not editorials when establishing facts in a situation. (Al is my high Brow, Randi is my Medium Brow and TMR is a nice mix of medium to low brow (depending on Sam's mood)
 
Back
Top