Ratzinger
- 291
- 0
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?
Ratzinger said:Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?
Tide said:There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.
ComputerGeek said:How much to Al Gore?
Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.
ComputerGeek said:Well on Fox, they do not air science because it is full of "just theories" not "facts", and movie stars provide a much better escape than boring science.
Burnsys said:Hey there are lots of facts in fox news! just see this:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/060705foxassures.htm
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fact was that Bush said it, not the actual statement. !Burnsys said:Hey there are lots of facts in fox news! just see this:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/060705foxassures.htm
![]()
![]()
![]()
i know. i know, but it's kind of tricky and funny. that is why i put themoose said:The fact was that Bush said it, not the actual statement. !