Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Collapses, Quantum Jumps, and the Born interpretation

  1. Aug 27, 2015 #1

    jimgraber

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    In my mind they are all the same.

    But some serious physicists (Schlosshauer, for example) claim there is no evidence for the existence of collapse.

    What about Lyman alpha emission, where an electron in a hydrogen atom “jumps” from level two to level one and emits a photon?

    Or the photoionization effect, or a Stern Gerlach experiment?

    Those all seem to me to be very obvious demonstrations of the existence of collapse.

    What am I missing?

    Or what would the no-collapse people reply?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 27, 2015 #2

    gill1109

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The no-collapse people are perhaps many worlds people who claim that nothing actually jumped at all because all possibilities co-exist in parallel worlds together.

    IMHO this is many-words, non-sense, but it seems a lot of people find it intellectually satisfying.
     
  4. Aug 27, 2015 #3

    Strilanc

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The short answer is that all those phenomena are explained with different mechanisms in different interpretations.

    For many worlds, they are explained via entanglement and decoherence. The Stern-Gerlacch system evolves into a superposition of the electron having gone up w/ the instrument reading "electron went up" and the electron having gone down w/ the instrument reading "electron went down". The two branches don't interfere with each other thereafter because the environment acts as a massive heat/information sponge (... until we saturate the available capacity and hit heat death), creating thermodynamically uneraseable differences. Non-interfering branches look classical-ish.
     
  5. Aug 27, 2015 #4

    bhobba

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Actually collapse isn't part of the QM formalism - just some interpretations.

    I think MW is nonsense as well. But having studied Wallaces book mathematically its very elegant and beautiful..

    Thanks
    Bill
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Collapses, Quantum Jumps, and the Born interpretation
  1. Quantum collapse (Replies: 38)

  2. Are there quantum jumps? (Replies: 57)

  3. Quantum jump (Replies: 5)

Loading...