Collision of Stars: How Often & How Many?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency of star collisions in galaxies, exploring theoretical estimates and the implications of stellar density and movement. Participants consider various definitions of "collision," including whether stellar mergers qualify, and reference different astronomical contexts such as globular clusters and binary star systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the likelihood of star collisions, emphasizing the vast distances between stars and suggesting that collisions are very unlikely.
  • Others propose that the frequency of collisions could be estimated using parameters similar to those in the Drake equation.
  • A participant provides calculations suggesting that with 100 billion stars in the Milky Way, a collision might occur roughly every 150 years, but leans towards the idea that none would happen in a given year.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of "collision," with some arguing that a stellar merger should count, while others assert that mere proximity does not constitute a collision.
  • References are made to globular clusters where collisions are more likely, with some evidence of such events leading to phenomena like blue stragglers.
  • A participant mentions hypervelocity supernovae as a rare class of stars that may relate to gravitational interactions, potentially affecting collision rates.
  • Some participants challenge earlier numerical estimates, suggesting they may be off by several magnitudes and emphasizing the need for precise definitions in calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the likelihood and frequency of star collisions, with no consensus reached on the estimates or definitions of what constitutes a collision.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "collision," the assumptions made in calculations, and the varying stellar densities in different regions of galaxies.

davidge
Messages
553
Reaction score
21
How frequently is collision of stars in galaxies? If there are 100 bi galaxies and 100 bi stars each, then how many collisions should we expect in within, say, 1 year?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
davidge said:
If there are 100 bi galaxies and 100 bi stars each,

that's a lower limit count :wink:

davidge said:
then how many collisions should we expect in within, say, 1 year?

somewhere between zero and none at all

Don't you understand the HUGE distances between stars ?
The closest star to earth/our Sun is ~ 4.2 lightyears

They also don't move around the galaxy in a random/haphazard motion ... it is reasonably orderly

PS. you really should have labelled your thread with a B tag :smile:Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidge
looks like a problem for the Drake equation, but different parameters!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidge
Gravity prefers orbits, collisions are possible but very unlikely
 
davidge said:
How frequently is collision of stars in galaxies? If there are 100 bi galaxies and 100 bi stars each, then how many collisions should we expect in within, say, 1 year?
Does a stellar merger count as a collision?

Edit, wiki has a page on stellar collisions
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_collision
 
davenn said:
somewhere between zero and none at all
I'm pretty sure you have overstated the likelihood of it happening. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
phinds said:
I'm pretty sure you have overstated the likelihood of it happening. :smile:

hahaha :-p
 
Someone should throw out numbers...

The sun's radius is 2.25461×10−8 parsec.
The local stellar density is about 0.14 stars per cubic parsec.
The sun move about 20km/s relative to neighborhood stars. one parsec in 1.5 x 1012 seconds which is about 49,000 years.
1.5 x 1012/ (2.25461×10−8 x 0.14)= 4.75 x 1020 seconds which is

1.5 x 1013 years for a collision.

With 100 billion stars in the milky way might happen in 150 years or so. very rough estimate. Leaning strongly toward none in a given year.
 
stefan r said:
Someone should throw out numbers...

The sun's radius is 2.25461×10−8 parsec.
The local stellar density is about 0.14 stars per cubic parsec.
The sun move about 20km/s relative to neighborhood stars. one parsec in 1.5 x 1012 seconds which is about 49,000 years.
1.5 x 1012/ (2.25461×10−8 x 0.14)= 4.75 x 1020 seconds which is

1.5 x 1013 years for a collision.

With 100 billion stars in the milky way might happen in 150 years or so. very rough estimate. Leaning strongly toward none in a given year.

If you read the link by BenAS, you will find your estimates are out by a number of magnitudes

just a small clip ...
A stellar collision is the coming together of two stars.[1] The mechanisms that drives such collisions include gravity, gravitational radiation, and other mechanisms not well understood. Astronomers predict that events of this type occur in the globular clusters of our galaxy about once every 10,000 years.[2]

Now note that was for a globular cluster where star density is very high, particularly in towards the core. General galaxy stellar densities are substantially lower
other than maybe lose to the core and the massive black hole that is there.

Dave
 
  • #10
And globular clusters do have evidence of collisions, or at least mass transfer (what does it mean for two gas balls to collide?). These are the so-called blue stragglers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
There is a rare class of stars known as hypervelocity supernova, suspected to result from gravitational ejection of a binary star system by a black hole. Such an event can accelerate their orbital decay by orders of magnitude. Only a handful of candidates have been identified since their discovery in 2000. The death spiral of a binary system. which ordinarily requires billions of years, could be reduced to mere millions in the case of sling shot binaries. See https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv789 for discussion.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
davenn said:
If you read the link by BenAS, you will find your estimates are out by a number of magnitudes
Did not square a number.

Is also not relevant. If the definition of "collision" is a merger than just coming within 2 solar radii is not a "collision". I thought my concussion was caused by a collision between my skull and pavement. Since my skull did not merge with the cement it must have been a close encounter.

Your link says
N
~ 4.2 · D2 Myr−1
twice solar radius is 4.51 x 10-8 parsecs so
N ~ 8.54 x 10-21 encounters within 2 solar radii per year for our sun.
 
  • #13
stefan r said:
Did not square a number.

Is also not relevant. If the definition of "collision" is a merger than just coming within 2 solar radii is not a "collision". I thought my concussion was caused by a collision between my skull and pavement. Since my skull did not merge with the cement it must have been a close encounter.
I really cannot make sense of that in the context of this thread
 
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
And globular clusters do have evidence of collisions, or at least mass transfer (what does it mean for two gas balls to collide?). These are the so-called blue stragglers.
yup, indeed :)
 
  • #15
Depending on your definition of "collision," you might only have to wait until 2022:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIC_9832227
The two members of this contact binary in Cygnus will spiral inward to produce a luminous red nova sometime in early 2022 that will easily be visible with the naked eye (magnitude 2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K