Collision of Two Hard Spheres: Solving the Center of Mass Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter hkyriazi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the center of mass collision of two hard spheres, where Sphere #1 has mass M and velocity V, while Sphere #2 has mass M/2 and is initially stationary. The calculated speeds after the collision are Sphere #1 at V/3 and Sphere #2 at 4V/3, demonstrating that a more massive object can impart a greater speed to a lighter stationary object. The key takeaway is that momentum conservation is paramount in collision analysis, often leading to counterintuitive results where the lighter object moves faster post-collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles, specifically momentum and kinetic energy conservation.
  • Familiarity with elastic and inelastic collisions.
  • Basic knowledge of mass and velocity relationships in physics.
  • Experience with mathematical problem-solving involving algebraic equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic collisions in one dimension.
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum and its applications in various collision scenarios.
  • Explore the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions through practical experiments.
  • Investigate real-world examples of momentum transfer, such as sports physics involving balls and bats.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding collision dynamics and momentum transfer in mechanical systems.

hkyriazi
Messages
174
Reaction score
2
I'm having trouble figuring out what seems to be a simple problem involving a center of mass collision of two hard spheres. Sphere #1 has mass M, and Sphere #2 has a mass of M/2. Sphere 1 is moving at velocity V, while Sphere 2 is stationary. What are their speeds after the collision? My problem is, that to conserve both momentum and kinetic energy, it seems that Sphere 2 must have a resulting speed equal to 4V/3 (and Sphere 1 a speed of V/3), which seems impossible. How could the impact from an object moving at only speed V lead an object initially at rest to recoil at an even greater speed (1.333V)?

For Momentum, this yields:

MV = (M/2)(4V/3) + MV/3 = 4/6 MV + 1/3 MV = 2/3 MV+ 1/3 MV

For Kinetic Energy:

1/2 MV2 = 1/2 (M/2) (4V/3)2 + 1/2 M(V/3)2
=M/4 (16/9) V2 + 1/18 MV2 = 4/9 MV2 + 1/18 MV2 = 9/18 MV2 = 1/2 MV2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you only need to conserve momentum.

In a way, momentum conservation is "better" or "stronger" than energy conservation. Sure, the latter is true in principle, but in practice either something blows up to release extra energy, or some kinetic energy is lost to heat, noise, etc. It's more obvious when a system looses significant momentum (big bits fly off).

Secondly, if you don't believe big thing hitting small thing can make the small thing go really fast, balance a tennis ball on an indoor soccerball (or a basketball) and drop them on the ground.
 
Thanks. I actually checked out the relationship between golf clubhead speed and ball speed yesterday, and did indeed determine that a more massive object can impact a stationary object and make it move faster than its own speed. (That webpage gave a typical ball speed as 140 mph, and clubhead speed as 95 mph.)

I think what was throwing off my intuition was that I must've been imagining aspects of an inelastic collision, where the objects would move at the same speed while they were connected, and then, since I was also imagining no compression, there wouldn't be any additional recoil momentum/speed added. In that case, the impacting object would just be "throwing" the impacted object, not bouncing off it. Instead, I should've been thinking of an instantaneous recoil.
 

Similar threads

Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K