A falling rotating rod strikes a ball of mass M....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a homogeneous rod that rotates and falls under the influence of gravity, striking a stationary ball. The context includes concepts from rotational dynamics, conservation of energy, and momentum in elastic collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy and angular momentum to determine the rotational speed of the rod before the collision and the conditions for the rod to remain stationary after the collision. There are questions about the correct formulation of equations and the implications of impulse during the collision.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of initial answers while others are exploring the implications of momentum conservation and impulse. There is ongoing clarification regarding the dimensional consistency of expressions and the nature of forces acting during the collision.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential missing information and assumptions about the system, such as the nature of the forces at play during the collision and the definition of impulse in this context.

Nexus99
Messages
103
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
is this correct?
Relevant Equations
conservation of energy, angular momentum ecc.
A homogeneous rod of length l and mass m is free to rotate in a vertical plane around a point A, the constraint is without friction.
Initially the rod is stopped in the position of unstable equilibrium, therefore it begins to fall rotating around A and hits, after a rotation of ## \pi ## , a ball of mass M resting on a plane at a distance l from the constraint.
The collision is elastic, calculate:
1) Rotational speed of the rod a moment before the collision
2) How much mass M should be so that the rod remain stationary after the collision
3) Magnitude of the impulse transferred by the constraint in the previous case

Cattura.PNG

I forgot to draw point A, but how you can image is where the rod begin looking the drawing from bottom to top

I did the problem in this way
1) Conservation of energy,
## E_i = mg \frac{3}{2} l ##
## E_f = mg \frac{1}{2} l + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 ## where ## I = \frac{ML^2}{3} ##
and i got ## \omega = \sqrt{\frac{6g}{l}} ##

2) Conservation of energy and angular momentum (calculating momentum from point A)

## mg \frac{1}{2} l + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2 ##
## I \omega = Mv l ##
and i got:
## v = \sqrt{6 g l}## and ## M = \frac{m}{3} ##

3) ## J_R = - \Delta p_M ## since the center of mass of the rod is not moving after the collision
## J_R = - \frac{m}{3}\sqrt{6 g l} ##
is the problem correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you sort your Latex: use double hashes, not single hanshes.
 
Sorry, i edited my previous post
 
Okpluto said:
Sorry, i edited my previous post
The answers to parts 1) and 2) look correct. Can you explain the answer to 3)? Especially in terms of the total linear momentum of the system.
 
Okpluto said:
2) Conservation of energy and angular momentum (calculating momentum from point A)

## mg \frac{1}{2} l + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2 ##
You got the right answer, but this equation should have the PE of the rod on both sides of the equation. Or, better, left out altogether, as it's the same before and after the collision.
 
PeroK said:
You got the right answer, but this equation should have the PE of the rod on both sides of the equation. Or, better, left out altogether, as it's the same before and after the collision.
Trying to explain the my solution i realized that i made a mistake:
## J_R = \Delta p_{tot} ## where ## p_{tot} ## stands fot total momentum of the system, not only the impulse given by the ball.
So i got:
## p_{tot} = \frac{m}{3}v - m \omega \frac{l}{2} = -m\frac{\omega}{6}l ##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okpluto said:
Trying to explain the my solution i realized that i made a mistake:
## J_R = \Delta p_{tot} ## where ## p_{tot} ## stands fot total momentum of the system, not only the impulse given by the ball.
So i got:
## p_{tot} = \frac{m}{3}v - m \omega \frac{l}{2} = -m\frac{\omega}{6} ##

Be careful. That answer is dimensionally inconsistent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nexus99
PeroK said:
Be careful. That answer is dimensionally inconsistent.
sorry, i forgot an l, now should be ok
 
Okpluto said:
Trying to explain the my solution i realized that i made a mistake:
## J_R = \Delta p_{tot} ## where ## p_{tot} ## stands fot total momentum of the system, not only the impulse given by the ball.
So i got:
## p_{tot} = \frac{m}{3}v - m \omega \frac{l}{2} = -m\frac{\omega}{6}l ##
It did say "magntitude" of the impulse, but that's a small issue!
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
It did say "magntitude" of the impulse, but that's a small issue!
That's true:
## |\vec{J_R}| = m\frac{\omega}{6}l ##
I have a question, is the impulse completely directed along x axis?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #11
Okpluto said:
I have a question, is the impulse completely directed along x axis?

Well, if you think about the rod just hanging there, we have the balanced forces of gravity and the restraining force at the pivot. The forces are balanced, so there is no motion. But, why not say that both forces are providing an equal an opposite impulse over a given time period? If impulse is force by time then why not?

Forces, impulses, accelerations are all vectors so they may cancel out when you add them.

That said, the impulse in the x-direction is a spike (large force over a short time giving a finite well-defined impulse); the impulse in the y-direction tends to zero as the time of the collision tends to zero, so is not particulary relevant in this case.

Interesting?!
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Well, if you think about the rod just hanging there, we have the balanced forces of gravity and the restraining force at the pivot. The forces are balanced, so there is no motion. But, why not say that both forces are providing an equal an opposite impulse over a given time period? If impulse is force by time then why not?

Forces, impulses, accelerations are all vectors so they may cancel out when you add them.

That said, the impulse in the x-direction is a spike (large force over a short time giving a finite well-defined impulse); the impulse in the y-direction tends to zero as the time of the collision tends to zero, so is not particulary relevant in this case.

Interesting?!
Ok understood, this happens because internal the restraining force is impulsive during the collision, right?
 
  • #13
Okpluto said:
Ok understood, this happens because internal the restraining force is impulsive during the collision, right?
The reason there is an impulse is that the impact with the ball tries to rotate the rod about some point below the pivot. The pivot prevents this and provides an opposite torque, which is also the external force that reduces the linear momentum of the system. Angular momentum about the pivot, of course, is conserved.
 
  • #14
PS I assumed they are talking about the impulse from the pivot during the collision only.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K