Collision question using conservation of kinetic energy

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 15K views
tippetmaster
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.00 kg mas (A) moving at 2.00 m/s strikes another 2.00 kg mass(B) which is at rest. Both are confined to a a straight line to move along.

An impossible outcome for this collision is that A sticks to B and they both move off together at 1.414 m/s. First show that this collision would satify conservation of kinetic energy and then explainwhy this is impossible.

Homework Equations


.5(mA)(vAi)2+.5(mb)(vbi)2=.5(mA)(vAf)2+.5(mb)(vbf)2


The Attempt at a Solution


I get that this is a perfectly ineleastic collision but why is it impossible and what does the question mean by "show that this satifies the consevation of kinetic energy" Does the above question even relate to the equation for the consevation of kinetic energy?

ANy help is appreciated thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's asking you to show that if they both stick together and move off at 1.414ms-1 then kinetic energy is conserved.
 
okay what does it mean if kinetc energy is conserved?
 
Satisfying conservation of kinetic energy means that the total kinetic energy before the collision is more than or equal the total kinetic energy after the collision since no energy can be created and energy could be lost to other forms, such as sounds, heat etc.

I get that this is a perfectly ineleastic collision
What makes you assume this?
 
Because if the colliding objects stick together after the collision then the collision is perfectly inelastic
 
so why is this situation impossible?
 
Oh sorry misread the question. Yes this impossible scenario is inelastic.

Simply use the conservation of momentum equation to show this is impossible ~

[tex]M_aU_a+M_bU_b=M_aV_a+M_bV_b[/tex] where m=mass, u=intial velocity, v=final velocity.
 
Mentallic said:
Oh sorry misread the question. Yes this impossible scenario is inelastic.

Simply use the conservation of momentum equation to show this is impossible ~

[tex]M_aU_a+M_bU_b=M_aV_a+M_bV_b[/tex] where m=mass, u=intial velocity, v=final velocity.

The question is not asking to prove that it's impossible, it's asking to explain why it's impossible.

Is there such thing as a perfectly elastic collision? Why/why not?