MHB Comaximal Ideals in a Principal Ideal Domain

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Prove that in a prinicpal ideal domain, two ideals (a) and (b) are comaximal if and only if a greatest common divisor of a and b (in which case (a) and (b) are said to be coprine or realtively prime)

Note: (1) Two ideals A and B of the ring R are said to be comaximal if A + B = R

(2) Let I and J be two ideals of R
The sum of I and J is defined as I+J = \{ a+b | a \in I, b \in J \}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Comaximal Ideas in a Principal Ideal Domain

I think you've found the answer on MHF.
 
Re: Comaximal Ideas in a Principal Ideal Domain

Well ... I am still working on the problem ... but I will be using your guidance regarding the way to progress

At my day job at the moment ... but will use your hint when I return to the problem

Thanks again

Peter
 
by def, two elements a,b in a PID are relatively prime if there exist, $m_1,m_2 \in $, such
that 1 = $m_1a+m_2b$

now if $a,b$ are relatively prime then

$\{r_1a + r_2b | r_1,r_2 \in R\}$, contains 1, if an ideal contains 1, then that ideal is identical to R.

Now <a> + <b> = $\{g_1a + g_2b | g_1,g_2 \in R\}$
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top