Combining Angular Momentum: A Comparison of Two Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter apunisheriii
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of two equations for angular momentum (L) of an electron in a Bohr model atom, specifically for the case when n=3. The original poster questions why the values obtained from the equations L=mrw and L=nh/2π differ, assuming non-relativistic conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the equations used for angular momentum and question the assumptions made regarding the speed of the electron. There is an exploration of how the speed relates to the radius in a circular orbit.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on checking the consistency of the equations and the assumptions made. There is an acknowledgment of the circular reasoning involved in using the angular momentum condition to derive the speed, but this has led to productive questioning and exploration of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the speed of the electron is dependent on the radius and that specific values must be derived from the physical conditions of the system, which may not have been fully established in the original attempts.

apunisheriii
can these be combined??

Homework Statement


why does the angular momentum,L of a electron in allowed orbit (for instance,n=3) is different when i used L=mrw
and L=nh/2pi??I'hv assumed tat the electron as non-relastivistic..

Homework Equations


i let speed of electron =70x105m/s and rn=ao9
*mass of electron,me=9.1x10-31kg

The Attempt at a Solution


K=1/2mev2-(1)
K=mer2w2-(2)

(1)=(2)
1/2mev2=1/2mer2w2
v=rw
v=rnw where the rnis the radius of permissible orbit in atom
v=ao9x w
w=1.47x1016

then,i started to find L (not 'light"in death note of course ^^)
L=mrw
=m(9ao)w
=6.37x10-24J s

but when i used L=nh/2pi the answer is 3.17x10-34J s

is the angular velocity couldn't use in this respect or the different is negligible??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi apunisheriii,

apunisheriii said:

Homework Statement


why does the angular momentum,L of a electron in allowed orbit (for instance,n=3) is different when i used L=mrw

This formula is not correct; for a particle, the angular momentum can be written as [itex]L=mrv= mr^2\omega[/itex], where [itex]v\perp r[/itex].

and L=nh/2pi??I'hv assumed tat the electron as non-relastivistic..


Homework Equations


i let speed of electron =70x105m/s

How did you find this speed? It does not look right to me.
 


oppss

din realize for tat mistake...haha thnx
with the equation L=mr2w
i get 3.03x10-33kg m s-1
which is much closer to the answer of the equation L=nh/2 pi

the speed of electron is just my assumption
is it wrong??becoz I am just trying to find w in order to find L
So,is it unsuitable for using such speed?
 


apunisheriii said:
oppss

din realize for tat mistake...haha thnx
with the equation L=mr2w
i get 3.03x10-33kg m s-1
which is much closer to the answer of the equation L=nh/2 pi

the speed of electron is just my assumption
is it wrong??becoz I am just trying to find w in order to find L
So,is it unsuitable for using such speed?

In the bohr atom, the speed of the electron will depend on the radius. So when you specify the radius (and the charges and masses), there is only one speed that works. The important thing is that the orbits are circular; so how can you relate the speed and radius?
 


alphysicist said:
In the bohr atom, the speed of the electron will depend on the radius. So when you specify the radius (and the charges and masses), there is only one speed that works. The important thing is that the orbits are circular; so how can you relate the speed and radius?

o,
So i should find the speed by using mv2/r=e2/4 pi epsilonor2

then v=7.29x105m/s
is it alright now?
 


apunisheriii said:
o,
So i should find the speed by using mv2/r=e2/4 pi epsilonor2

then v=7.29x105m/s
is it alright now?

That approach looks right to me; go ahead and check it: plug it into your expression

[tex] m r v = \frac{n h }{2\pi}[/tex]

and see if both sides are equal.
 


yes,mostly the same. thnx
i think I am doing something stupid...haha
just like using informations to find same informations...
 


apunisheriii said:
yes,mostly the same. thnx
i think I am doing something stupid...haha
just like using informations to find same informations...

It is a bit circular, because the angular momentum quantization condition [itex]mvr=nh/(2\pi)[/itex] and centripetal acceleration condition [itex]mv^2/r = k e^2/r^2[/itex] are used to find the bohr radius, which you used to check the angular momentum condition. But the important thing is that you noticed something that looked wrong and decided to find out what the explanation was. That's not stupid; that's the way to understanding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K