Combining Cos(t)'s from (sin2t + sin3t)/2*sint

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter toneboy1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the function x(t) = (sin2t + sin3t)/2*sint, focusing on determining its period and exploring potential simplifications. Participants engage in various mathematical manipulations, including the use of exponential forms and trigonometric identities, to analyze the function's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their approach after converting the function into exponential form and obtaining a sum of cosines, asking if it can be simplified further to find the period.
  • Another participant suggests using trigonometric identities, such as sin(2t) = 2sin(t)cos(t), to expand sin(3t) and simplify the expression.
  • A participant questions whether their simplification is complete, indicating they have reached a complex expression involving multiple cosine terms.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of negative cosine terms on the period, with one participant noting that a phase shift does not affect the period.
  • Several participants discuss the period of cosine functions, with references to radians and the relationship between the period and the function's arguments.
  • One participant realizes that their plotting in MATLAB may have led to confusion regarding the period, prompting a discussion about the representation of time in seconds versus non-dimensional arguments.
  • Another participant clarifies the concept of non-dimensional arguments in periodic functions and how they relate to physical quantities.
  • There is a correction regarding a participant's earlier calculation involving sine and cosine identities, leading to a revised expression for x(t).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the simplification of the function and its implications for determining the period. There is no clear consensus on the best approach or the final form of the function, and several interpretations of the period are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' calculations depend on specific trigonometric identities and assumptions about the representation of time, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the period based on different approaches.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in mathematics and physics who are interested in trigonometric functions, periodicity, and mathematical simplifications in the context of signal analysis or related fields.

toneboy1
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
The question was given: x(t) = (sin2t + sin3t)/2*sint

determine the period. So I converted numerator and denominator into the exponential forms and ended up getting (after flipping, timesing and cancelling)
(exp(j3t)-exp(-j)-exp(j)+exp(-3j)+exp(j4)-exp(-2j)-exp(j2)+exp(-4j)) / 2

which in turn turns into

x(t) = cos(3t) - cos(t) - cos(2t) + cos(4t) if I'm not mistaken

so is there a way of simplifying this into maybe one Cos or something so I can find the period?

Or have I done this question the wrong way?Thanks heaps!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use sin(2t)=2sin(t)cos(t). then write sin(3t)=sin(2t+t) and expand it. next use
[itex]\cos(2t) = 2 \cos^{2}t - 1[/itex]. you then end up with
[tex]x(t) = \cos t + 2 \cos^{2}t - \frac{1}{2}[/tex]
 
samalkhaiat said:
...then write sin(3t)=sin(2t+t) and

That is very clever.

So I got to:

(2.sin(t).cos(t) + sin(2t).cos(t)+cos(2t).sin(2t)) / 2sin(t)

[2.sin(t).cos(t)+2sin(t).cos(t).cos(t)+(cos^2(t)-sin^2(t))*(2.sin(t).cos(t)) ]
/ 2sint

(then) although I have ended up with cost+cos^2 t + cos^3 t - sin^2(t).cost

Have I done something wrong or am I not finished simplifying it? (I can't think of what else to do).Thanks
 
Last edited:
toneboy1 said:
The question was given: x(t) = (sin2t + sin3t)/2*sint

determine the period. So I converted numerator and denominator into the exponential forms and ended up getting (after flipping, timesing and cancelling)
(exp(j3t)-exp(-j)-exp(j)+exp(-3j)+exp(j4)-exp(-2j)-exp(j2)+exp(-4j)) / 2

which in turn turns into

x(t) = cos(3t) - cos(t) - cos(2t) + cos(4t) if I'm not mistaken

so is there a way of simplifying this into maybe one Cos or something so I can find the period?

Or have I done this question the wrong way?


Thanks heaps!
Once you have a sum of cosines, the period is the lowest common multiple of the periods of the terms.
 
toneboy1 said:
That is very clever.

So I got to:

(2.sin(t).cos(t) + sin(2t).cos(t)+cos(2t).sin(2t)) / 2sin(t)


Have I done something wrong or am I not finished simplifying it? (I can't think of what else to do).


Thanks

sin(t+2t) = sin(t)cos(2t)+sin(2t)cos(t)
 
nasu said:
Once you have a sum of cosines, the period is the lowest common multiple of the periods of the terms.

What about if the Cosine is negative? Anyway so that would mean from the answer in my original post the period was 't'?

Thanks
 
samalkhaiat said:
sin(t+2t) = sin(t)cos(2t)+sin(2t)cos(t)

Isn't that what I did?
 
toneboy1 said:
What about if the Cosine is negative? Anyway so that would mean from the answer in my original post the period was 't'?

Thanks
-cos(x)=cos(x+π)
That component will have a phase of π, in respect to the other components. Does not change the period, though.
 
nasu said:
-cos(x)=cos(x+π)
That component will have a phase of π, in respect to the other components. Does not change the period, though.

Ah, I see. So it was '1'. When I plotted the sum of: x(t) = cos(3t) - cos(t) - cos(2t) + cos(4t) in MATLAB it generated a period of 6.275 or something, how can this be?

Observe the picture attached
 

Attachments

  • PF.png
    PF.png
    12.8 KB · Views: 792
  • #10
What would you expect? What is the period of cos(t)?
 
  • #11
nasu said:
What would you expect? What is the period of cos(t)?

Please enlighten me, 360 deg?
 
  • #12
In radians is 2π or about 6.28.
 
  • #13
nasu said:
In radians is 2π or about 6.28.

so from the result I got, how was 2π≈6.28?
 
  • #14
toneboy1 said:
so from the result I got, how was 2π≈6.28?

I am not sure what are you asking. The value of 2π is not a consequence of your result but the other way around.
π or "PI" is 3.1415...
so 2π= 6.28...

Now the period of a function like sin(x) or cos (x) is 2π. This means that sin(x+2π) = sin(x).
In these expressions x is a non-dimensional variable.

You can also write sin(x+360) = sin(x) but then your x should be in hexadecimal degrees too.
Matlab uses radians, I suppose.
 
  • #15
nasu said:
I am not sure what are you asking. The value of 2π is not a consequence of your result but the other way around.
π or "PI" is 3.1415...
so 2π= 6.28...

Now the period of a function like sin(x) or cos (x) is 2π. This means that sin(x+2π) = sin(x).
In these expressions x is a non-dimensional variable.

You can also write sin(x+360) = sin(x) but then your x should be in hexadecimal degrees too.
Matlab uses radians, I suppose.

AH! Because I was plotting it like it was in Time (seconds)

Playing Devil's advocate, would it be fair to make 't' as seconds and plot the thing and say it took 6.28 seconds for a period?
 
  • #16
In physics we usually make the arguments of the functions non-dimensional.
A physical quantity periodic in time will be represented by something like
sin(2∏t/T) so t is in seconds and T is the "physical" period, in seconds.
This has the property

sin[2∏(t+T)/T)]=sin(2∏t/T) so the period is T.
 
  • #17
nasu said:
In physics we usually make the arguments of the functions non-dimensional.
A physical quantity periodic in time will be represented by something like
sin(2∏t/T) so t is in seconds and T is the "physical" period, in seconds.
This has the property

sin[2∏(t+T)/T)]=sin(2∏t/T) so the period is T.

what do you mean by 'non-dimensional' exactly?

Could I plead the case that since that T is 2π, it is 6.28 seconds?

How did the 'sin[2∏(t+T)/T)]' come about?
 
  • #18
toneboy1 said:
Isn't that what I did?

No, look again at your calculations. you put

[tex]\sin (2t) = \sin (2t) \cos (t) + \cos (2t) \sin (2t)[/tex]

which is wrong.
 
  • #19
samalkhaiat said:
No, look again at your calculations. you put

[tex]\sin (2t) = \sin (2t) \cos (t) + \cos (2t) \sin (2t)[/tex]

which is wrong.

You're right, thanks, would you be happy with:

(2.sin(t).cos(t) + sin(2t).cos(t)+cos(2t).sin(t)) / 2sin(t)

[2.sin(t).cos(t)+2sin(t).cos(t).cos(t)+(cos^2(t)-sin^2(t))*sin(t)) ]
/ 2sint

∴ 2cost + 2cos^2(t) +Cos^2(t)-(1-cos^2(t)) / 2

∴ 2Cos^2(t) + Cos(t) - 1/2

which is about as simple as you can get, with a period 2π?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K