Commutate my hamiltonian H with a fermionic anihillation operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the commutation of a Hamiltonian, expressed as H = ∑kb_k(dagger)b_k, with a fermionic annihilation operator. The Hamiltonian describes phonon oscillations using bosonic operators, leading to questions about the commutation relations between fermionic and bosonic operators. It is established that different types of quasiparticles, such as phonons and fermions, can be treated as distinguishable particles, allowing for the application of wave function symmetrization principles. The discussion concludes that non-interacting phonons exhibit sharply peaked spectral functions, behaving like stable particles, while interactions lead to collisional broadening.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum physics
  • Familiarity with bosonic and fermionic operators
  • Knowledge of wave function symmetrization principles
  • Basic concepts of spectral functions and quasiparticles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the commutation relations of bosonic and fermionic operators
  • Explore the concept of quasiparticles in many-body physics
  • Learn about spectral functions and their significance in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the effects of interactions on phonon behavior in solid-state physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics, and anyone studying the interactions between fermionic and bosonic systems.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have problem where I need to commutate my hamiltonian H with a fermionic anihillation operator. Had H been written in terms of fermionic operators I would know how to do this, but the problem is that it describes phonon oscillations, i.e. is written in terms of bosonic operators:
H = ∑kb_k(dagger)b_k
How do I commute this with a fermionic operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have different kinds of (quasi) particles the corresponding annihilation and creation operators all commute.
 
So in terms of symmetrization of wave functions, should I understand different quasiparticles as distinguishable particles such that the complete wavefunction is a simple product of the fermion and boson wavefunction?
edit: wait.. phonon oscillations are even real particles so wave function symmetrization etc. does not really make sense to talk about.
How should I understand, starting from the basic wave function symmetrization (from which the creation and anihillation operators came), that the operators commute?
 
Phonons are elementary excitations of the normal modes of lattice vibrations of solid. These you can describe either by the position and momentum variables of the molecules making up the lattice or, equivalently, in terms of annihilation and creation operators as for one simple oscillator. These annihilation and creation operators fulfill the same commutation relations as the analogous operators for bosonic particles. That leads to the picture of various collective modes (here lattice vibrations) of a many-body system as "quasi-particle excitations". As long as the coupling of the quasiparticles to other degrees of freedom is weak, they have sharply peaked spectral functions. For non-interacting phonons the spectral function is given by a sum of \delta distributions, and thus they behave mathematically like stable particles. If you include interactions, e.g., with electrons, single atoms or impurities of the lattice leads to scattering and thus collisional broadening of the phonon's spectral function. The classical analogue of this is that the lattice vibrations are damped, i.e., energy is dissipated from the vibrations to other degrees of freedom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K