Angular momentum operator for 2-D harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the angular momentum operator ##L## for a 2-dimensional harmonic oscillator using ladder operators ##a_x##, ##a_y##, ##a_x^\dagger##, and ##a_y^\dagger##. The proposed operator is ##L = (x + y) × (p_x + p_y) = -i \hbar ((a_x^\dagger + a_y^\dagger) × (a_x + a_y) + a_x × a_x + a_y × a_y)##. The user seeks to demonstrate that this operator commutes with the Hamiltonian ##H = \hbar \omega (a_x^\dagger a_x + a_y^\dagger a_y + 1)##, but encounters complex product terms in the commutator. It is advised to first establish the commutation of ##L^2## with the Hamiltonian, which holds true when the spring constants in both x and y directions are equal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with ladder operators in quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics and commutation relations
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, specifically cross products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties and applications of ladder operators in quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Explore the commutation relations between operators in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the conditions under which operators commute, particularly in harmonic systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone studying the properties of 2-dimensional harmonic oscillators and angular momentum in quantum mechanics.

Rabindranath
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
1. The problem statement

I want to write the angular momentum operator ##L## for a 2-dimensional harmonic oscillator, in terms of its ladder operators, ##a_x##, ##a_y##, ##a_x^\dagger## & ##a_y^\dagger##, and then prove that this commutes with its Hamiltonian.

The Attempt at a Solution



I get

##L = (x + y) × (p_x + p_y) = -i \hbar ((a_x^\dagger +a_y^\dagger) × (a_x + a_y) + a_x × a_x + a_y × a_y)##.

Does this seem to make any sense?

As for the commutator, with Hamiltonian ##H = \hbar \omega (a_x^\dagger a_x + a_y^\dagger a_y + 1) ##, I consequently get all sorts of exotic product terms, e.g.

## \left ( (a_x^\dagger +a_y^\dagger) × (a_x + a_y) \right ) a_x^\dagger a_x ##

and the like, and I'm not comfortable with handling these. I want all of them to go away, for said operators to commute, but am not sure how to do/see that.

Any comments would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should rather show that the operator ##L^2##, which is the same as ##L_{z}^{2}## for motion on the xy-plane, commutes with the Hamiltonian. This actually happens only when the "spring constants" are the same in x and y directions and the potential energy ##V(r,\theta )## depends only on the radial coordinate ##r##.
 
You can first work out the commutator of Lz with the Hamiltonian. In your attempt, the way you wrote L is wrong. You should work out the cross product of the position vector and the momentum vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K