Commutation and Eigenfunctions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of operators in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding commutation and eigenfunctions. It is established that any operator commutes with itself, and this is proven by the definition of the commutator, where [Q, Q] equals zero. Additionally, the relationship between an operator Q and its eigenvalue problem is explored, confirming that if \(\hat{Q}\psi=\lambda\psi\), then \(\hat{Q}^{2}\psi=\lambda^{2}\psi\) holds true. The discussion also clarifies that while commuting operators have simultaneous eigenfunctions, non-commuting operators do not.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics operators
  • Familiarity with eigenvalue problems
  • Knowledge of commutation relations
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of commutators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of simultaneous eigenfunctions
  • Learn about non-commuting operators and their effects on measurements
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of linear operators in Hilbert spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on operator theory, and mathematicians interested in linear algebra applications in physics.

CanIExplore
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
My first question is, does any operator commute with itself? If this is the case, is there a simple proof to show so? If not, what would be a counter-example or a "counter-proof"?

My second question has to do with the properties of an eigenvalue problem. If you have an operator Q such that [tex]\hat{Q}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda\psi[/tex], then is the following always true?

[tex]\hat{Q}^{2}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda^{2}\psi[/tex]

Since [tex]\hat{Q}^{2}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\hat{Q}\hat{Q}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\hat{Q}\lambda\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda\hat{Q}\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda\lambda\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda^{2}\psi[/tex].

And is there a more general way of saying this? Like,

[tex]\hat{Q}[/tex][tex]_{i}[/tex][tex]\hat{Q}[/tex][tex]_{j}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\hat{Q}[/tex][tex]_{i}[/tex][tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]_{j}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]_{j}[/tex][tex]\hat{Q}[/tex][tex]_{i}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]=[tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]_{i}[/tex][tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]_{j}[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

Which should always be true even if the operators don't commute because the lambdas are just scalars right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Of course an operator commutes with itself [Q,Q] is always 0 from the definition of the commutator

For the last part you wouldn't be able to write it like that if the operators don't commute. Commuting operators have simultaneous eigenfunctions, non-commuting ones do not
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K