Commutation relation of operators

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
mathfilip
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Im reading in a quantum mechanics book and need help to show the following relationship, (please show all the steps):

If A,B,C are operators:

[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathfilip said:
Im reading in a quantum mechanics book and need help to show the following relationship, (please show all the steps):

If A,B,C are operators:

[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C

Just expand out the commutation operators based on the definition, i.e. [X,Y]=XY-YX.

When you see how easy this is, you will laugh and might even be embarrassed that you posted such an easy question :smile: - no offense intended ... I've done much worse.
 
stevenb said:
Just expand out the commutation operators based on the definition, i.e. [X,Y]=XY-YX.

When you see how easy this is, you will laugh and might even be embarrassed that you posted such an easy question :smile: - no offense intended ... I've done much worse.

I've often done much worse too. :redface:
Moreover, there are some similar formulas, which can be proven easily and similarly:
[tex][A,BC] = \{A,B\} C - B\{ A , C \}[/tex]
[tex]\{ A , BC \} = \{A,B\}C - B[A,C] = [A,B]C + B\{A,C\}[/tex]
where the square bracket denotes the commutator and the curly bracket denotes the anti-commutator.

Probably mathfilip wanted to specify the point that the algebra must be "associative", or these formulas are not valid.
 
Last edited: