Commutation relation of operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the commutation relation of operators in quantum mechanics, specifically demonstrating the relationship [A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C. Participants emphasize the importance of expanding commutation operators based on the definition [X,Y] = XY - YX. Additionally, they mention similar formulas involving both commutators and anti-commutators, highlighting the necessity of associative algebra for these relationships to hold true.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics operators
  • Familiarity with commutation and anti-commutation relations
  • Knowledge of algebraic structures, specifically associative algebra
  • Basic mathematical manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of commutators and anti-commutators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore examples of operator algebra in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of associative algebra in quantum theory
  • Investigate related formulas and their proofs in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with operator theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum systems.

mathfilip
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Im reading in a quantum mechanics book and need help to show the following relationship, (please show all the steps):

If A,B,C are operators:

[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathfilip said:
Im reading in a quantum mechanics book and need help to show the following relationship, (please show all the steps):

If A,B,C are operators:

[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C

Just expand out the commutation operators based on the definition, i.e. [X,Y]=XY-YX.

When you see how easy this is, you will laugh and might even be embarrassed that you posted such an easy question :smile: - no offense intended ... I've done much worse.
 
stevenb said:
Just expand out the commutation operators based on the definition, i.e. [X,Y]=XY-YX.

When you see how easy this is, you will laugh and might even be embarrassed that you posted such an easy question :smile: - no offense intended ... I've done much worse.

I've often done much worse too. :redface:
Moreover, there are some similar formulas, which can be proven easily and similarly:
[tex][A,BC] = \{A,B\} C - B\{ A , C \}[/tex]
[tex]\{ A , BC \} = \{A,B\}C - B[A,C] = [A,B]C + B\{A,C\}[/tex]
where the square bracket denotes the commutator and the curly bracket denotes the anti-commutator.

Probably mathfilip wanted to specify the point that the algebra must be "associative", or these formulas are not valid.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K