Commutation relation of the position and momentum operators

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the non-commuting nature of position and momentum operators in quantum mechanics, specifically how to derive the equation involving these operators. The user seeks clarification on transitioning from the expression involving the momentum operator acting on the product of position and wave function to a form that includes both the wave function and its derivative. The explanation emphasizes the application of the product rule in differentiation, which leads to the inclusion of an additional term in the resulting equation. Recommendations for textbooks include Shankar and Griffiths, with a note that Shankar may be more suitable for advanced learners. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these fundamental concepts in quantum mechanics.
Newbie says Hi
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've just initiated a self-study on quantum mechanics and am in need of a little help.

The position and momentum operators do not commute. According to my book which attemps to demonstrate this property,
(1) \hat{p} \hat{x} \psi = \hat{p} x \psi = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x \psi)

OK, so far I was following. I'm not understaing how they get to this next equation from the previous one...
(2) = -i \hbar \left( \psi + x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)

To be more precise, where did the second psi symbol come from and where did the + symbol come from in equation 2?

Homework Equations



\hat{x} = x
\hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}


The Attempt at a Solution



When I attempt to multiply the momentum and position operators, I get:
(3) \hat{p} \hat{x} \psi = \hat{p} x \psi = \left( -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) x \psi

But how do I go from equation 3 and arrive at equation 2? Or can I?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
psi also depends on x. This leads to the second derivative.
You may need a live teacher to learn QM.
 
Meir Achuz said:
psi also depends on x. This leads to the second derivative.
You may need a live teacher to learn QM.

OK, I understand the first part, but I am not following why it "leads to the second derivative." Could you please explain in more detail? Or preferably, could you show me the next few steps after equation (1)?
 
What book are you using ? Throw it away. One postulates the commutation relations, they cannot be proved.
 
dextercioby said:
What book are you using ? Throw it away. One postulates the commutation relations, they cannot be proved.

The author of the book is demonstrating that \hat{p} \hat{x} \psi does NOT equal \hat{x} \hat{p} \psi .

Sorry if I miscommunicated this point in the first post.
 
I understand the solution to why \hat{x} \hat{p} \psi equals what it equals. My question just has to do with how the author gets the solution that he does for the \hat{p} \hat{x} \psi
 
Are you asking how you get from the left to the right hand side of this? \left( -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) x \psi = -i \hbar \left( \psi + x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right).

If so, then note that x\psi is a product, each of which is dependent on x, and so we must use the product rule. So, starting from the left \left( -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) x \psi =-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x\psi)=-i\hbar(x\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}+\psi)
 
Last edited:
Newbie says Hi said:

Homework Statement



I've just initiated a self-study on quantum mechanics and am in need of a little help.

The position and momentum operators do not commute. According to my book which attemps to demonstrate this property,
(1) \hat{p} \hat{x} \psi = \hat{p} x \psi = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x \psi)

OK, so far I was following. I'm not understaing how they get to this next equation from the previous one...
(2) = -i \hbar \left( \psi + x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)

To be more precise, where did the second psi symbol come from and where did the + symbol come from in equation 2?
It's simply the product rule. If f (x) is a function of x, then \frac{d}{dx} ( x f(x) ) = 1 \times f(x) + x \times \frac{df(x)}{dx}
, right?

What book are you using? I would highly recommend Shankar and, as a supplement, Griffiths.
 
Great. Thanks a LOT cristo and nrqed!

I love this site! :)

nrqed said:
What book are you using? I would highly recommend Shankar and, as a supplement, Griffiths.

I am currently using two books: "Quantum Mechanics for Undergraduates" by Norbury as well as Griffiths (both books use the same template and complement each other strongly). I also have Shankar, however, after going through the first chapter, I found it was too math heavy... perhaps it is aimed at graduates?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K