Commutation Relations and Unitary Operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of commutation relations involving unitary operators and the 4-momentum operator, specifically addressing a claim made by Srednicki. The correct transformation of the 4-momentum operator is given by the equation βP^{\mu}(x')=U(\Lambda)P^{\mu}(x)U^{\dagger}(\Lambda), leading to the commutation relation [P^{\mu}(x),M^{\nu\lambda}(x)]_{-}= i\hbar g^{\mu[\nu}P^{\lambda]}(x). The discussion concludes that for the relation to hold for any antisymmetric tensor \delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}, it must be true for each coefficient, confirming the validity of Srednicki's equation (2.18).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operator algebra
  • Familiarity with unitary transformations in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of 4-momentum operators and their properties
  • Basic grasp of antisymmetric tensors and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore unitary transformations in the context of quantum field theory
  • Learn about the implications of antisymmetric tensors in physics
  • Review Srednicki's Quantum Field Theory for deeper insights into operator relations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as students seeking to understand the mathematical foundations of commutation relations and unitary operators.

abode_x
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with deriving another result. Sorry I am new to this field. Please see the attached PDF - everything is there.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
What you're trying to prove is wrong. Srednicki is wrong. If you make the unitary transformation of the 4-momentum operator the way it should be done, namely

\bar{P}^{\mu}(x')=U(\Lambda)P^{\mu}(x)U^{\dagger} (\Lambda)

then you get the correct RHS

\bar{P}^{\mu}(x')=U(\Lambda)P^{\mu}(x)PU^{\dagger} (\Lambda)= \Lambda^{\mu}{}_{\nu} P^{\nu}(x)

which leads to the commutation relation

\left[P^{\mu}(x),M^{\nu\lambda}(x)\right]_{-}= i\hbar \ g^{\mu[\nu}P^{\lambda]}(x)
 
Last edited:
abode_x: you got
{i\over2\hbar}\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}] <br /> =\delta\omega^\mu{}_\nu P^\nu
Next,
\delta\omega^\mu{}_\nu P^\nu<br /> =\delta\omega_{\rho\nu}g^{\rho\mu} P^\nu<br /> =\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma
Next, use that \delta\omega_{\rho\sigma} is antisymmetric, and so we can replace g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma with its antisymmetric part,
{1\over2}(g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma-g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho)
This gives
{i\over2\hbar}\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}]={1\over2}\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}(g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma-g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho)
For this to be true for any \delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}, it must be true of each coefficient. So,
{i\over2\hbar}[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}]<br /> ={1\over2}(g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma-g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho)
Multiply by -2i\hbar and switch the two terms on the right to get
[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}] =i\hbar(g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho-g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma)
Using g^{\sigma\mu}=g^{\mu\sigma}, this matches Srednicki's eq.(2.18).
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K