Commutation Relations and Unitary Operators

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
abode_x
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with deriving another result. Sorry I am new to this field. Please see the attached PDF - everything is there.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
What you're trying to prove is wrong. Srednicki is wrong. If you make the unitary transformation of the 4-momentum operator the way it should be done, namely

[tex]\bar{P}^{\mu}(x')=U(\Lambda)P^{\mu}(x)U^{\dagger} (\Lambda)[/tex]

then you get the correct RHS

[tex]\bar{P}^{\mu}(x')=U(\Lambda)P^{\mu}(x)PU^{\dagger} (\Lambda)= \Lambda^{\mu}{}_{\nu} P^{\nu}(x)[/tex]

which leads to the commutation relation

[tex]\left[P^{\mu}(x),M^{\nu\lambda}(x)\right]_{-}= i\hbar \ g^{\mu[\nu}P^{\lambda]}(x)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
abode_x: you got
[tex]{i\over2\hbar}\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}] <br /> =\delta\omega^\mu{}_\nu P^\nu[/tex]
Next,
[tex]\delta\omega^\mu{}_\nu P^\nu<br /> =\delta\omega_{\rho\nu}g^{\rho\mu} P^\nu<br /> =\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma[/tex]
Next, use that [tex]\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}[/tex] is antisymmetric, and so we can replace [tex]g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma[/tex] with its antisymmetric part,
[tex]{1\over2}(g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma-g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho)[/tex]
This gives
[tex]{i\over2\hbar}\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}]={1\over2}\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}(g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma-g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho)[/tex]
For this to be true for any [tex]\delta\omega_{\rho\sigma}[/tex], it must be true of each coefficient. So,
[tex]{i\over2\hbar}[P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}]<br /> ={1\over2}(g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma-g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho)[/tex]
Multiply by [tex]-2i\hbar[/tex] and switch the two terms on the right to get
[tex][P^\mu,M^{\rho\sigma}] =i\hbar(g^{\sigma\mu}P^\rho-g^{\rho\mu} P^\sigma)[/tex]
Using [tex]g^{\sigma\mu}=g^{\mu\sigma}[/tex], this matches Srednicki's eq.(2.18).