MHB Commutative ring | Exam question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krizalid1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Ring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mathematical exam question regarding ideals in commutative rings. It asserts that for any ideal \(\overline{J}\) of the quotient ring \(A/I\), there exists an ideal \(J\) in \(A\) that contains \(I\) and whose lateral classes correspond to \(\overline{J}\). Participants analyze the proof by constructing an inverse map and demonstrating that it preserves the ideal structure. They confirm that the preimage of \(\overline{J}\) is indeed an ideal of \(A\) and establish a bijection between ideals of \(A\) containing \(I\) and ideals of \(A/I\). The conversation highlights the simplicity and elegance of the proof, showcasing the fundamental properties of ideals in ring theory.
Krizalid1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
This is a question I gave in one of my exams. :D

If $I$ is an ideal of the commutative ring $A$ (with unity), then prove that for each ideal $\overline J$ of the quotient ring $A/I$, exists an ideal $J$ of $A$ that contains the ideal $I$ and the lateral classes of $I$ defined by the elements of $J$ are the elements of $\overline J.$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Too easy? Too boring? :D
 
Krizalid said:
This is a question I gave in one of my exams. :D

If $I$ is an ideal of the commutative ring $A$ (with unity), then prove that for each ideal $\overline J$ of the quotient ring $A/I$, exists an ideal $J$ of $A$ that contains the ideal $I$ and the lateral classes of $I$ defined by the elements of $J$ are the elements of $\overline J.$

Krizalid said:
Too easy? Too boring? :D

I didn't even see it. It seems simple. Let me try.

$\pi: A \longrightarrow A / I$?

Is it that simple?
 
Almost...you want the inverse map:

[math]\pi^{-1}:P(A/I) \to P(A)[/math], where [math]P(S)[/math] is the power set of [math]S[/math].

Then given an ideal [math]\overline{J}[/math] of [math]A/I[/math], we have to show that [math]\pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math] is an ideal of [math]A[/math] containing [math]I[/math].

Since any ideal [math]\overline{J}[/math] of [math]A/I[/math] contains [math]I = 0 + I[/math], we have that [math]\pi^{-1}(0 + I) = \text{ker}(\pi) = I \subseteq \pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math].

Next, we have to show [math]\pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math] is an ideal. So let [math]x,y \in \pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math]. This means that:

[math]\pi(x),\pi(y) \in \overline{J}[/math], hence [math]\pi(x) - \pi(y) = \pi(x - y) \in \overline{J}[/math]

(since [math]\overline{J}[/math] is an ideal, and [math]\pi[/math] is a ring homomorphism) hence [math]x - y \in \pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math].

This shows that [math]\pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math] is an additive subgroup of [math]A[/math].

Now let [math]a \in A[/math] be arbitrary, and likewise choose an arbitrary [math]x \in \pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math].

We want to show that [math] ax \in \pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math].

But: [math]\pi(ax) = \pi(a)\pi(x)[/math] and [math]\pi(x) \in \overline{J}[/math], so since [math]\pi(a) \in \pi(A) = A/I[/math], and [math]\overline{J}[/math] is an ideal of [math]A/I[/math],

[math]\pi(ax) \in \overline{J}[/math], thus [math]ax \in \pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math].

Since [math]A[/math] is commutative, this suffices to show that [math]\pi^{-1}(\overline{J})[/math] is an ideal of [math]A[/math].

Next, we want to show that this map, restricted to the ideals of [math]A/I[/math], is injective. So let [math]\overline{J},\overline{K}[/math] be two ideals of [math]A/I[/math],

such that [math]J = \pi^{-1}(\overline{J}) = \pi^{-1}(\overline{K})[/math].

Then [math]\overline{J} = \pi(\pi^{-1}(\overline{J})) = \pi(\pi^{-1}(\overline{K})) = \overline{K}[/math].

Furthermore, if [math]J[/math] is ANY ideal of [math]A[/math] containing [math]I[/math], we have the ideal [math]\pi(J) = J/I[/math] of [math]A/I[/math] with:

[math]J = \pi^{-1}(J/I)[/math] (this is NOT true of sets in general, and only holds in this case because

[math]\pi[/math] is a surjective ring homomorphsm).

This establishes a bijection between ideals of [math]A[/math] containing [math]I[/math] and ideals of [math]A/I[/math]:

[math]J \leftrightarrow \overline{J} = J/I[/math]
 
Deveno, I admire your divine ( ;) ) patience! I'm very lazy with latex (and in general...).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top