- #1

- 117

- 12

_{n}> transmorphs into the statement involving the kroneck delta functions.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- #1

- 117

- 12

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

Mentor

- 43,846

- 21,264

Somali_Physicist said:_{n}> transmorphs into the statement involving the kroneck delta functions.

What definition and what statement? Please give specific references.

- #3

- 117

- 12

- #4

- 8,938

- 2,926

Somali_Physicist said:Apologies

So we have two different complete bases:

##|a_n\rangle##

##|b_m\rangle##

If we let ##C_{nm} = \langle b_m|a_n\rangle##, then you can write:

##|a_n\rangle = \sum_m C_{nm} |b_m\rangle##

At this point, they are just defining ##|(a_n) b\rangle## to be ##\sum_m C_{nm} \ \delta_{b, b_m}|b_m\rangle##. The point of the ##\delta_{b, b_m}## is to include only those terms such that ##b_m = b##. It's just a fact that:

##\sum_m C_{nm} |b_m\rangle = \sum_b \sum_m C_{nm} \ \delta_{b, b_m}|b_m\rangle = \sum_b |(a_n) b\rangle##

So:

##|a_n\rangle = \sum_b |(a_n) b\rangle##

Share:

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 588

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 284

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 855

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 620

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 665

- Replies
- 30

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 438

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 785

- Replies
- 21

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 540