Compact Notation of RxN Mechanism

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Hello all!

I am reading through a combustion text and I am a little flustered by this notation:

Doc-8_27_109_17PM-page-1.jpg


Am I correct in saying that the "coefficient matrices" {[itex]{\nu'_{ji}}[/itex]} and {[itex]{\nu''_{ji}}[/itex]} are not really "proper" matrices in the sense that there is not a vector that can multiply them that will result in the system of equations given by 4.29? Or is there? And I am just too tired to figure this out?

Also, the fact that the ij indices are reversed from normal convention (i.e., i = row index and j=column index) is really driving me batty!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hmmm ... maybe I am Wrong here and I AM just tired:

I guess if we multiply [itex]\nu'_{ji}[/itex] by the column vector
[tex] \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> X_1\\X_2\\X_3\\X_4\\X_5\\X_6\\X_8<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

The index thing is still bothering me. Usually when we see Amn we have a matrix in which there are 'm' rows and 'n' columns ...