Compact Sets and Function Pre-Image Example | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter analysis001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an example of a compact set \( D \subseteq \mathbb{R} \) such that the pre-image \( f^{-1}(D) \) is not compact. The context involves concepts from topology and real analysis, particularly focusing on the properties of continuous functions and their images.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the notation and implications of \( f^{-1}(D) \) versus \( f(D) \). There is an attempt to clarify the definitions and the requirements of the problem. Some participants suggest using the sine function as a potential example, while others express confusion regarding how it fits the criteria.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the notation and attempting to clarify the problem statement. Some guidance has been offered regarding visualizing the relationship between sets and functions, but no consensus has been reached on a specific example.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the notation used in the problem, particularly distinguishing between the pre-image and the function inverse. Participants are also grappling with the implications of continuity and compactness in the context of the sine function.

analysis001
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find an example of a set D\subseteqR is compact but f-1(D) is not.


Homework Equations


f-1(D) is the pre-image of f(D), not the inverse.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble visualizing a function that would work for this scenario. Any clues would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
analysis001 said:

Homework Statement


I need to find an example of a set D\subseteqR is compact but f-1(D) is not.


Homework Equations


f-1(D) is the pre-image of f(D), not the inverse.
Unless f is a map from D to itself, your notation doesn't make sense. The symbol f(D) implies that D is the domain, and f(D) is the image under f. The symbol f-1(D) implies that D is now the range.
analysis001 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble visualizing a function that would work for this scenario. Any clues would be helpful.
 
Mark44 said:
Unless f is a map from D to itself, your notation doesn't make sense. The symbol f(D) implies that D is the domain, and f(D) is the image under f. The symbol f-1(D) implies that D is now the range.

Ok, I might have summarized the problem wrong. I'll write it word for word here:

Consider a function f:RR which is continuous on all of R. Find an example satisfying the following:
D\subseteqR is compact but f-1(D) is not.
 
The image of the sine function is the interval [-1, 1]. The inverse image of [-1, 1] is R. If we're talking about inverse image as opposed to function inverse (f-1), this should work. If you really do mean f-1 as the function inverse, then no, it won't work, as the sine function isn't one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse that is a function.
 
Mark44 said:
The image of the sine function is the interval [-1, 1]. The inverse image of [-1, 1] is R. If we're talking about inverse image as opposed to function inverse (f-1), this should work. If you really do mean f-1 as the function inverse, then no, it won't work, as the sine function isn't one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse that is a function.

Yes, it's talking about the inverse image, not the function inverse. I don't really see how f(D)=sin(D) would work though. If the question was to find a f(D)\subseteqR where f(D) is compact but f-1(D) is not then I see how f(D)=sin(D) would work, because f(D)=[-1,1] is compact but f-1(D)=R is not (I think). Maybe I'm just understanding it wrong because I don't see how f(D)=sin(D) works.
 
analysis001 said:
Yes, it's talking about the inverse image, not the function inverse. I don't really see how f(D)=sin(D) would work though. If the question was to find a f(D)
No. You're getting all balled up in the notation and not understanding what it's supposed to mean. The problem is to find a function and a set D (NOT f(D)) that is compact, but the inverse image of D is not compact.

A number d ##\in## D provided that there exists a real number x for which sin(x) = d. Draw a picture with two sets, with x in one set and d in the other set (set D). That might be helpful.


analysis001 said:
\subseteqR where f(D) is compact but f-1(D) is not then I see how f(D)=sin(D) would work, because f(D)=[-1,1] is compact but f-1(D)=R is not (I think). Maybe I'm just understanding it wrong because I don't see how f(D)=sin(D) works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K