Compare Dry & Wet Friction: How Far Will a Car Skid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wapapow10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the difference in skid distance for a car on dry versus wet concrete, using coefficients of kinetic friction μK(dry) = 0.81 and μK(wet) = 0.53. The initial approach incorrectly compared forces instead of using kinematic equations to find displacement. The correct method involves calculating the ratio of distances skidded on wet and dry surfaces, leading to the conclusion that a car would skid 153% of the distance on wet concrete compared to dry, indicating a 53% increase in skid distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics, specifically the equation D = -v0² / (2a)
  • Knowledge of Newton's second law (F = ma)
  • Familiarity with coefficients of friction in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations and ratios
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations in detail, focusing on constant acceleration scenarios
  • Learn about the effects of different surfaces on vehicle dynamics
  • Research the concept of hydroplaning and its impact on vehicle control
  • Explore practical applications of friction coefficients in automotive safety engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in vehicle dynamics and safety measures during adverse weather conditions.

Wapapow10
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

A driver makes an emergency stop and inadvertently locks up the brakes of the car, which skids to a stop on dry concrete. Consider the effect of rain on this scenario. If the coefficients of kinetic friction for rubber on dry and wet concrete are
μK(dry) = 0.81 and μK(wet) = 0.53,
how much farther would the car skid (expressed in percentage of the dry-weather skid) if the concrete were instead wet?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


F=uk*g
F=.81*9.8
F=7.93

F=.53*9.8
F=5.19

5.19/7.93=65.44%

Got this wrong and I'm not sure what I'm missing[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force isn't directly proportional to the displacement, so you can't just take the ratio of the forces. Figure out first how far each one will go (use kinematics, and remember that F=ma), then take that ratio. Keep in mind that you should take the ratio of wet/dry displacement, so you'll get a number like 1.53, and that means that in wet concrete the car travels 153% of what it travels in dry concrete, or that it travels 53% more.
 
Thats what I'm lost on. I don't know the mass or acc of the car. I don't know where to start we didnt get a chance to go over this in class and the work is due tomorrow.
 
You don't need to know the mass of the car. All the unknown quantities (mass, initial velocity I think are the only two) will cancel out when you take the ratio, because you can obviously assume it's the same car and everything :D
 
I guess I missed something in class. I can't get it to work out I changed it over to F=ukg that was no help. tired just f=ma as well
 
Ah, allright- I'll get you part of the way there ;).
From kinematics, we know that when there's constant acceleration (let's assume it's constant), the following holds: v^2=v_0^2+2aD
Now, the situation we have describes zero velocity at the end, so D=-\frac{v_0^2}{2a}
This is the general case (for any acceleration). Now, let's get specific: for the wet concrete, we have some acceleration a_w for the car, and for dry concrete we have an acceleration a_d. What we want to find is the ratio D_w/D_d. Keep in mind that D_w=-\frac{v_0^2}{2a_w} and that D_d=-\frac{v_0^2}{2a_d}
Now to find the respective accelerations, just use dynamics; I think you were ok on that part.

Afterwards, when you take the ratio of the distances, the v_0^2 terms (as well as the mass) will cancel and everything will be ok.
 
Wapapow10 said:

Homework Statement

A driver makes an emergency stop and inadvertently locks up the brakes of the car, which skids to a stop on dry concrete. Consider the effect of rain on this scenario. If the coefficients of kinetic friction for rubber on dry and wet concrete are
μK(dry) = 0.81 and μK(wet) = 0.53,
how much farther would the car skid (expressed in percentage of the dry-weather skid) if the concrete were instead wet?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


F=uk*g
F=.81*9.8
F=7.93

F=.53*9.8
F=5.19

5.19/7.93=65.44%

Got this wrong and I'm not sure what I'm missing[/B]
In a real world scenario, where hydroplaning occurs, the coefficient of friction is basically zero. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K