Comparing APWR and PWR Core/Fuel Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter friendboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differences between Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (APWR) and Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) core and nuclear fuel characteristics. It confirms that while APWR and PWR share similarities, particularly in fuel rod design, specific data from PWR can be utilized for calculating nuclear flux and burn-up in APWR applications. The AP1000, a variant of APWR, features a 14-ft (4.27 m) active fuel length and utilizes standard 17x17 fuel assemblies. Relevant technical specifications can be found in the NRC Design Control Document, specifically sections 4.1 and 4.2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear reactor types, specifically APWR and PWR
  • Familiarity with nuclear fuel design and specifications
  • Knowledge of nuclear flux and burn-up calculations
  • Access to NRC technical documentation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the AP1000 Design Control Document on the NRC website
  • Study the differences in core design between APWR and PWR
  • Learn about the implications of fuel rod specifications on reactor performance
  • Investigate nuclear flux and burn-up calculation methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor designers, and researchers involved in the analysis and optimization of nuclear reactor performance, particularly those focusing on APWR and PWR technologies.

friendboy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What's the significant difference between APWR and PWR in terms of core and nuclear fuel, I mean, if we want to calculate nuclear flux and burn up of APWR, can we use PWR data instead?

btw, anyone knows a site that provides AP1000 datasheet or specification?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The AP1000 uses a 14-ft (4.27 m) active fuel length, similar to that used by South Texas and EdF 1300 MWe plants. The fuel rods are more or less standard 17x17 fuel with 14-ft pellet stack.

One can find technical information on the NRC website in the Design Control Document, particularly sections 4.1 and 4.2.

For the AP1000, see
http://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/idmws/ViewDocByAccession.asp?AccessionNumber=ML083230868
Items 134 - 139.
 
Last edited:
Astronuc said:
The AP1000 uses a 14-ft (4.27 m) active fuel length, similar to that used by South Texas and EdF 1300 MWe plants. The fuel rods are more or less standard 17x17 fuel with 14-ft pellet stack.

One can find technical information on the NRC website in the Design Control Document, particularly sections 4.1 and 4.2.

Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K
Replies
10
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K