Comparing Maple and Mathematica: Pros & Cons

  • Context: Mathematica 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Angelos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Mathematica
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 7K views
Angelos
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have a simply question...Which program is better and why? Maple or Mathematica?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I prefer mathematica. To me, it seems rather powerful and simple once you get used to the annoying commands.
 
I decided on male a while back because it had a more intuitive/ mathematical interface, and didn't make you use commands for 99% of its functions. however I have never used or seen a copy of mathematica so I could be wrong.
 
I have only used maple, and it takes some getting used to but is definitely a very powerful program, we used it quite a lot in my calc 3 class as far as graphing in 3 dimensions, and doing multiple Integration and/or flux-divergence work