Comparing Planck's Mass, Length, Time and Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the comparison of Planck's mass, length, time, and energy as defined by physicist Sean Carroll. The values are established as follows: Planck mass (mp) is approximately 2.18 x 10-8 kg, Planck length (lp) is about 1.63 x 10-35 m, Planck time (tp) is roughly 5.39 x 10-44 s, and Planck energy (Ep) is around 1.95 x 109 J. The discussion emphasizes that quantum gravity becomes significant only at scales greater than mp, shorter than tp, smaller than lp, or energies exceeding Ep. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) currently operates at energies significantly lower than Ep, necessitating larger accelerators for future experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and general relativity
  • Familiarity with Planck units and their significance
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically regarding the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Basic mathematical skills for interpreting scientific equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck units in quantum gravity theories
  • Explore the capabilities and limitations of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Learn about the significance of energy scales in particle collisions
  • Investigate advancements in particle accelerator technology for future experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, particle physicists, and anyone interested in the fundamental constants of nature and their implications in modern physics.

George Keeling
Gold Member
Messages
183
Reaction score
42
TL;DR
Planck's mass, length, time and energy. I wanted to compare them with actual things. Some don't seem extreme.
Sean Carroll gives the Planck's set of four dimensioned quantities: Planck's mass, length, time and energy. I wanted to compare them with actual things.\begin{align}

m_p=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar c}{G}}&=2.18\times{10}^{-8}\rm{kg}&\rm{{10}^{7}\ E. coli}\phantom {100000000000000000000}&\phantom {10000}(1)\nonumber\\

l_p=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar G}{c^3}}&=1.63\times{10}^{-35}\rm{m}&\rm{Radius\ of\ proton\ ={10}^{-15}\ m}\phantom {10000}&\phantom {10000}(2)\nonumber\\

t_p=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar G}{c^5}}&=5.39\times{10}^{-44}\rm{s}&\rm{Cosmic\ inflation\ ends\ at\ {10}^{-32}s}\phantom {10000}&\phantom {10000}(3)\nonumber\\

E_p=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar c^5}{G}}&=1.95\times{10}^9\rm{J}&\rm{Sun\ emits{\ 10}^{26}\ Js^{-1}. \text{ A-bomb}\rm={10}^{12}}\ J&\phantom {10000}(4)\nonumber\\

&=1.22\times{10}^{19}\rm{GeV}&

&\phantom {10000}\nonumber

\end{align}He then says "Most likely, quantum gravity does not become important until we consider particle masses greater than ##m_p##, or times shorter than ##t_p##, or lengths smaller than ##l_p##, or energies greater than ##E_p##; at lower scales classical GR should suffice. Since these are all far removed from observable phenomena, constructing a consistent theory of quantum gravity is more an issue of principle than of practice."

Whilst it is unimaginable that we will see things shorter than ##t_p## or smaller than ##l_p##, particle masses ('point masses') greater than ##m_p## are commonplace in GR and energies greater than ##E_p## are happening all the time. Can anybody help me make sense of the ##m_p,E_p## parts? And why are those 'greater than' and the others 'less than'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From your post I calculate "Planck momentum" of M_p c= 6.54 kg m/s which amounts a pitched baseball with 100 miles/hour speed. We can see it in major league game.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: George Keeling
He means energies involved in a single particle-particle collision. The LHC can accelerate protons to about a millionth of the Planck energy (if memory serves) (edit:) of a Joule, so we're going to need a bigger accelerator.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: George Keeling and Dale
mitochan said:
From your post I calculate "Planck momentum" of M_p c= 6.54 kg m/s which amounts a pitched baseball with 100 miles/hour speed. We can see it in major league game.
Much better than collecting 10 million bacteria!
 
Ibix said:
The LHC can accelerate protons to about a millionth of the Planck energy (if memory serves), so we're going to need a bigger accelerator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider say "After upgrades it reached 6.5 TeV per beam 13 TeV (= ##1.3\times 10^4## GeV) total collision energy," so that's ##10^{15}## times bigger!
 
Correct - my memory was faulty. It's one millionth of a Joule they can reach (source). So we're going to need an even bigger accelerator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
855
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K