I was wondering if it is possible to work out the maximum amount of energy an object with mass can have using the length contraction equation (i.e. "actual" length divided by Lorentz factor).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The way I thought of doing this was by rearranging e = mc^2 to get c^2 = e/m. Then, substitute e/m into the length contraction equation. Once you've done that, just rearrange the equation to get energy and substitute Plank length for the contracted length.

Now assuming you have the values for the rest of the variables (i.e. mass, "actual" length, speed), you can calculate the maximum amount of energy that an object with that mass can have. My reasoning behind this is that the Planck length is the shortest distance in the universe (it may well not be but that's an assumption I'm making in this case) and so the length can't be contracted any further than this value. Thus, the output value of the equation is the maximum energy that the object can have.

This is probably wrong, but I'm curious to know about the mistakes I may have made.

[tex]

\frac{mv^{2}}{\left ( \frac{l}{l\bullet } \right )^{2}-1} = e

[/tex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Subbing Planck length into length contraction equation?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**