Comparing toughness of physics grad schools

  • Context: Schools 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grad Physics Schools
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perceived "toughness" of physics graduate school courses, specifically comparing the difficulty of courses at different universities. Participants share personal experiences and seek ways to evaluate and compare their coursework against that of other institutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the difficulty of their quantum mechanics course, suggesting it may be comparable to courses at prestigious institutions like MIT or Princeton.
  • Another participant points out that many top universities publish their coursework online, providing a resource for comparison.
  • A third participant notes the use of a specific textbook, indicating a shared academic reference among participants.
  • Another participant expresses surprise regarding the choice of textbook edition used in the course, hinting at differing expectations about course materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the overall difficulty of their courses compared to other universities, and multiple perspectives on the use of course materials and resources are presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the subjective nature of "toughness" and the lack of standardized metrics for comparing graduate courses across institutions.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Comparing "toughness" of physics grad schools

I was wondering if anyone knows any good ways of finding out how one's courses (specifically grad classes) stacks up against other universities? My undergrad courses were probably a 5 on a 1-10 scale of what i can imagine would be the typical difficulties you'd see in an American university. Now I enter into my grad first semester QM course and a friend of mine who already received his MS tells me and a couple friends that this professor who teaches the course attempts to put the difficulty at what you'd see at a place like MIT or Princeton. I thought "yah, right, whatever". I start the semester off thinking that hey, it's grad school, it's going to be a new ballgame, a step up, etc etc. From the get-go this class has been like a shotgun blast to the face yet I'm achieving better grades on assignments than ever before (our midterm we just took, I may have been the only one to finish). Thus, I'm really wondering if my friend was right and now I'm looking to see if there's a way to actually compare my program or at least my course with courses at top universities. I highly doubt universities publish their grad course homeworks/test/lectures...

The thinking behind my professor bumping up the difficulty is supposedly so that since you can only get a MS at my university, they want to produce students that are of the caliber of students entering into any PhD program in the country and wouldn't have to play catchup.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a lot of top schools actually do publish their course work

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-04Spring-2006/CourseHome/index.htm

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-321Quantum-Theory-IFall2002/CourseHome/index.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Nice, that prof uses Sakurai too :)
 


im surprised they use modern sakurai and not advanced sakurai.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
981
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K