Comparing Weight Gain in Rats: An Analysis of Diets A & B

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a statistical analysis comparing weight gain in male rats fed two different diets, A and B, with a focus on the application of an F-test and a t-test. The F-test was conducted to compare sample standard deviations, with a calculated F-value of 2.29 and a critical value of 3 at a 5% significance level, leading to the conclusion that the null hypothesis of equal variances cannot be rejected. Subsequently, a t-test was performed to compare the means, yielding a t-value of 3.49 and confirming the use of a 95% confidence interval. The discussion also touches on the appropriateness of using confidence intervals versus hypothesis testing and the considerations for determining sample size in such studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of F-tests for variance comparison
  • Knowledge of t-tests for mean comparison
  • Familiarity with confidence intervals in statistical analysis
  • Basic principles of hypothesis testing
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to perform an F-test using statistical software like SPSS
  • Study the formulas for independent two-sample t-tests with equal and unequal variances
  • Explore the interpretation of confidence intervals in practical research contexts
  • Research methods for determining appropriate sample sizes in experimental studies
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, researchers in animal studies, and students in statistics courses who are analyzing experimental data and learning about hypothesis testing methods.

  • #31
I like Serena said:
Yes...

So the interval would be close to zero in the plus and minus direction, something like
(-3, 3)

Like that yeah?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yes! :smile:

So how can you see from your interval whether it is significant or not?
 
  • #33
Because my interval has both boundaries greater than zero, we're 95% certain the difference is between these boundaries, so that means we're 95% certain the difference is greater than zero. This is significant and forces us to reject the null hypothesis?
 
  • #34
Yep! :smile:

When you use a CI in a test to compare the means of two samples, the criterion is whether the CI contains zero.
 
  • #35
Ah I see! :smile:

So it would be better to do a confidence interval instead of a t-test?
 
  • #36
Ah, now we're getting into the murky stuff that is open questions and discussions.

Let me counter that by asking: what are the pro's and con's of a CI versus a t-test?
What's the difference anyhow between a t-test and this confidence interval?

And I'll ask one more question: can you do a 1-sided test with a confidence interval?
 
  • #37
With a CI, we know that if the interval doesn't contain zero the means can't be the same. With a t-test we're relying on probabilities and approximations.

I would sat yes, because if you test Ha: u1>u2, and find a CI for u1-u2, and if this doesn't contain zero we're 95% certain Ha is true
 
  • #38
Maybe_Memorie said:
With a CI, we know that if the interval doesn't contain zero the means can't be the same. With a t-test we're relying on probabilities and approximations.

Wow! Stop!
A CI does not give certainty!
Basically the CI is a t-test. It's just represented differently.
But the ultimate result (rejection or not) is the same.

Maybe_Memorie said:
I would sat yes, because if you test Ha: u1>u2, and find a CI for u1-u2, and if this doesn't contain zero we're 95% certain Ha is true

Hmm, suppose the CI is (-6, -1).
That does not contain 0.
Does that mean Ha is probably true?
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K