Completeness of an inner product space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the completeness of the inner product space V, defined as the space of polynomials with complex coefficients, using the inner product (f,g)=∫₀^∞ f(x)̅g(x)e^(-x)dx. The participants confirm that while V is an inner product space, it is not complete due to the Weierstrass approximation theorem, which states that continuous functions can be approximated by polynomials. A specific example is provided using the function f(x)=e^(-x) and its polynomial approximations, demonstrating that the limit of these approximations is not a polynomial, thereby confirming the incompleteness of V.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert spaces and inner product spaces
  • Familiarity with the Weierstrass approximation theorem
  • Knowledge of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of convergence in functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Weierstrass approximation theorem in detail
  • Explore the properties of inner product spaces in functional analysis
  • Investigate the concept of completeness in metric spaces
  • Learn about polynomial interpolation techniques and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying functional analysis, as well as educators and researchers interested in the properties of inner product spaces and polynomial approximations.

Hjensen
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm on a course which is currently introducing me to the concept of Hilbert spaces and the professor in charge was giving examples of such spaces. He ended by considering V, the space of polynomials with complex coefficients from \mathbb{R} to \mathbb{C}. He then, for f,g\in V, defined

(f,g)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(x)\bar{g(x)}e^{-x}dx​

and claimed - without proof - that V equipped with (\cdot ,\cdot ) is an inner product space, but that V is not complete. Could anyone come up with a clever way of showing that this is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a classical theorem which applies here (from Wikipedia).
-----------------------------------------------------------
In mathematical analysis, the Weierstrass approximation theorem states that every continuous function defined on an interval [a,b] can be uniformly approximated as closely as desired by a polynomial function. Because polynomials are among the simplest functions, and because computers can directly evaluate polynomials, this theorem has both practical and theoretical relevance, especially in polynomial interpolation. The original version of this result was established by Karl Weierstrass in 1885.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

In other words, (not polynomial) continuous functions can be the limit of polynomials. Therefore the space of only polynomials is not complete.

You would need to do a little work to extend this to the space of functions you are concerned with, but the general idea would be to approximate non - polynomials with polynomial sequences using the given inner product norm, rather than uniform approximation (sup norm).
 
Thank you for your help, I'll get on it later today.
 
Last edited:
Edit: Rubbish.
 
Last edited:
Let f(x)=e-x and fn(x) be the polynomial defined by the first n terms. This will show it is not complete, since fn(x) converges to f(x), which is not a polynomial. Moreover, it is easy to show that any polynomial will have a finite norm.
 
mathman said:
Let f(x)=e-x and fn(x) be the polynomial defined by the first n terms.
of a Taylor's series expansion of e^{-x}.

This will show it is not complete, since fn(x) converges to f(x), which is not a polynomial. Moreover, it is easy to show that any polynomial will have a finite norm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K