Graduate Completeness of the formal power series and valued fields

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of demonstrating the completeness of formal power series in valued fields, specifically regarding the convergence of Cauchy sequences. The user outlines their approach using the properties of the valuation of polynomials, indicating that for a Cauchy sequence of power series, the coefficients must stabilize for convergence. They express confusion about how to apply their findings to part (b) of the problem, suggesting that it may follow a similar logic to part (a). Clarifications are sought on how to proceed with part (b) based on the established understanding of Cauchy sequences and their limits. The conversation highlights the intricacies of working with formal power series and the importance of coefficient behavior in establishing convergence.
aalma
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Trying to understand the completeness of K[[x]] and how to show that every cauchy sequence in it has a limit in K[[x]].
I had difficulty showing this no matter what I tried in (a) I am not getting it. Here for p(t) in K[[t]] : ## |p|=e^{-v(p)} ## where v(p) is the minimal index with a non-zero coiefficient.
I said that p_i is a cauchy sequence so, for every epsilon>0 there exists a natural N such that for all i,j>N we have
## |p_i(t)-p_j(t)|<epsilon ##, which is equivalent to that
## v(p_i(t)-p_j(t))>e^{-epsilon} ##.
But could not see how it helps here!.

Any clarifications would be great
 

Attachments

  • 20230125_193801.jpg
    20230125_193801.jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 155
  • 20230125_194140.jpg
    20230125_194140.jpg
    34.7 KB · Views: 144
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In order for ##||p_i-p_j||## to be smaller than ##\varepsilon=e^{-n}## (for large ##i,j##) it must be the case that the first nonzero term of ##p_i-p_j## has degree larger than ##n##, i.e. the coefficients of ##1,t,...,t^n## are the same for ##p_i## and ##p_j.## So, for any fixed degree ##k##, the coefficient of ##t^k## in your sequence is eventually constant and the limit of your Cauchy sequence is just the power series whose coefficient of ##t^k## is this element of ##K##.
 
Thanks!
Here is what I did in a.
can you give direction for b? I think it would be similar to a but could not see how..
20230129_222740.jpg
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K