MHB Completing the square using algebra tiles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Square
Gitty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to create a square using algebra tiles. The question is x^2 + 4x + 5. I know how to do it without the algebra tiles but I don't know how to do it with the algebra tiles.

Can anyone give me a hand with this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the following diagram:

View attachment 5305

In the quadratic:

$$y=x^2+4x+5$$

Let the green square represent $x^2$, which we have, and the 2 blue rectangles each represent $$2x$$ ($x$ by 2), which we also have, and so we see the red square will need to have side lengths of 2, and thus an area of 4, so we can then write:

$$y=\left(x^2+4x+4\right)+1$$

We know the expression within the parentheses represents the entire square, whose sides measure $x+2$, and so we may write:

$$y=(x+2)^2+1$$
 

Attachments

  • comsquare.jpg
    comsquare.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 89
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top