Complex Representations: Real vs. Complex Lie Algebras

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lapidus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Representation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of complex representations in the context of Lie algebras, specifically addressing the distinction between real and complex forms. Spinors are identified as complex representations of SO(3), while SU(n) represents a real form despite having complex entries. The conversation highlights the ambiguity surrounding the term "complex" in different contexts, particularly in physics versus mathematics. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying structure constants to clarify whether a representation is considered complex.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebras and their representations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of real and complex numbers in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of the special orthogonal group SO(3) and special unitary group SU(n)
  • Basic principles of quantum field theory (QFT) and spinor representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the structure constants of Lie algebras and their implications for representation theory
  • Study the relationship between complex representations and real forms in depth
  • Explore the mathematical definitions of spinors in the context of SO(3) and SU(2)
  • Examine the differences in terminology and definitions between physics and mathematics regarding complex representations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students studying representation theory, particularly those interested in the nuances of complex and real forms of Lie algebras.

Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
When do we call a representation complex? What are examples of complex representations?

Also, when we say real and complex forms of Lie algebras, is that related to real and complex representation classification?

I read that spinors are complex representations of SO(3), because their components are complex and the matrices that act on them have complex entries. But then I read elswhere SU(n) with comlex entries, but taken over the real numbers is a real form.

Or does it come down to structure constants? If they are real or complex, so is the representation?

THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it just mean in the physics literature that the matrices have complex entries?

I know that su(2) is the real form of sl(2,C). That means the su(2) matrices have complex entries but are defined over the real numbers. So you can have complex matrices but still a real Lie algebra.

But then in the QFT book that I'm currently reading is written that the (1/2,0) and (0,1/2) Weyl spinor reps are comlex reps. Unfortunately, the author fails to mention why and how. Can someone explain?

That's why it is never clear to me what people mean when they say complex Lie algebras or complex representations. What is complex? Entries of matrices, of vectors, the coefficients? Highly confusing!
 
Check the context: i.e. is the writer a mathematician of a physicist? Does the context make sense in terms of lie algebras or is it more informal?

- you will have noticed that people do not always use the exact definitions of words, and that different fields have different definitions anyway.
It is a problem - but you get used to it. Treat as an English comprehension exercise where metaphor and implied meanings are allowed.
Usually only one meaning will make sense.

Bear in mind the content of the wikipedia entry posted above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K