Complex Scalar Field and Probability Field

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the similarities between the conserved current of a free complex scalar field and the probability current in quantum mechanics, specifically through the equations governing probability density and current. The Lagrangian for the complex scalar field is presented, highlighting its role in describing conserved currents that resemble those found in probability theory. The conversation touches on the historical context of these concepts, linking them to the evolution of quantum mechanics and the transition from a probability interpretation to one involving electric charge. The participants acknowledge that these ideas are well-documented in numerous texts, emphasizing their foundational importance in theoretical physics. The relationship between complex scalar fields and probability currents remains a significant topic in understanding quantum field theory.
jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I was looking at the lagrangian and conserved currents for the free complex scalar field and it looks like it has a striking similarity to the conserved current for probability:
<br /> \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}=\nabla\cdot \vec{j}<br />
where j_i =-i(\psi^{\ast}\partial_i \psi - \psi\partial_i \psi^{\ast}) and \rho is the probability density. Then with the action
<br /> \mathcal{L}=\partial_\alpha \psi^{\ast}\partial^\alpha \psi<br />
the conserved current is
<br /> j^{\alpha}=-i(\psi^\ast \partial^\alpha \psi - \psi \partial^\alpha \psi^\ast )<br />
Then I had the thought that with the conservation of probability current, the above lagrangian appears to be a lagrangian for a free field of...probability. Now I'm aware that the complex scalar field is used to describe various spin-0 particles, but has anyone heard of any other possible thoughts on this lagrangian, maybe back when it was first put forward, or when anyone was just looking at relativistic quantum mechanics about 100 years ago?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no coincidence. The so-called Schroedinger field described by a complex wavefunction in a Galilei invariant space-time goes into the complex free KG field. But when the probability interpretation of the current derived from phase invariance fails, a new interpretation is necessary, the electric charge one.

This is classic stuff described in a gazillion of books.
 
Good to know, thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K