Complex Variables - Zeros of Analytic Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on extending the argument principle in complex analysis to prove a generalized theorem involving analytic functions. The key formula discussed is $$\frac{1}{2i\pi} \int_\omega \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)}g(z)dz = \sum_{i=1}^N g(z_i) - \sum_{j=1}^M g(w_j)$$, where \(g\) is analytic on a domain containing the contour \(\omega\). The proof involves factorizing \(h(z)\) and applying Cauchy's integral formula. Additionally, the discussion explores the analytic nature of the inverse function \(f^{-1}(w)\) using the integral $$\displaystyle f^{-1}(w)=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\omega \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)-w}\, dz$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals, including analytic functions and contour integration.
  • Understanding of the argument principle and its applications in complex analysis.
  • Familiarity with Cauchy's integral formula and Cauchy's theorem.
  • Knowledge of the properties of one-to-one analytic functions and their inverses.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the argument principle in detail, focusing on its proof and applications in complex analysis.
  • Learn about Cauchy's integral formula and its implications for analytic functions.
  • Explore the concept of biholomorphisms and conditions for analytic inverses.
  • Investigate the properties of zeros and poles of analytic functions in relation to contour integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, as well as researchers exploring analytic functions and their properties.

joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Studying for my complex analysis final. I think this should be a simple question but wanted some clarification.

"Extend the formula

$$\frac{1}{2i\pi} \int_\omega \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)}\, dz = \sum_{j=1}^N n_j - \sum_{k=1}^M m_k$$

to prove the following.

Let $g$ be analytic on a domain containing $\omega$ and its inside. Then

$$\frac{1}{2i\pi} \int_\omega \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)}g(z)dz = \sum_{i=1}^N g(z_i) - \sum_{j=1}^M g(w_j)$$

where $z_1,...,z_N$ are the zeros of h and $w_1,...,w_M$ are the poles of h inside $\omega$, each listed according to its multiplicity."

Does this just utilize the theorem that states that

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2i\pi} \int_\omega \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)}\, dz =$ number of zeros of h inside $\omega$ - number of poles of h inside $\omega$?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi joypav,

A method of proof used to prove the argument principle applies to the generalized theorem. Namely, factorize

$$h(z) = \frac{(z - z_1)\cdots (z - z_N)}{(z - w_1)\cdots (z - w_M)} f(z)$$

where $f$ is analytic and zero-free on an open neighborhood of $\omega$.

$$\frac{h'(z)}{h(z)}g(z) = \sum_{i = 1}^N \frac{g(z)}{z - z_i} - \sum_{j = 1}^M \frac{g(z)}{z - w_j} + \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}g(z)$$

Integrate both sides over $\omega$, divide by $2 i\pi$, and use Cauchy's integral formula and Cauchy's theorem to establish

$$\frac{1}{2i\pi} \int_\omega \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)} = \sum_{i = 1}^N g(z_i) - \sum_{j = 1}^M g(w_j)$$
 
Got it... thank you
 
Following this same question... I want to show that
$$\displaystyle f^{-1}(w)=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\omega \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)-w}\, dz $$
where f is analytic and one to one on a domain D.

What I have:

$\omega$ is a piecewise smooth closed curve in D whose inside lies in D. Say $\Omega=f(D)$.
(the final goal is to show that $f^{-1}$ is analytic on $\Omega$)

Let w be a point of $\Omega$.
Let $g(z)=z$ and $h(z)=f(z)-w$.

We know from the previous question,
$$\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\omega \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)}g(z)dz = \sum_{i=1}^N g(z_i) - \sum_{j=1}^M g(w_j)$$

By making substitutions we get,
$$\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\omega \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)-w}zdz = \sum_{i=1}^N z_i - \sum_{j=1}^M w_j$$Now it seems like I am almost done. Is this correct so far?
I'm not sure how why the right side is equivalent to $f^{-1}(w)$, or if I am even on the right track.
We know,
$$h(z)=f(z)+w$$
$$f(z)=h(z)-w$$
$$f^{-1}(z)=h^{-1}(z-w)$$
$$f^{-1}(w)=h^{-1}(0)$$
And h has zeros ${z_1,...,z_N}$
I thought that may be how I can show their equivalence?
 
The inverse function $f^{-1}$ need not be analytic. In fact, analytic functions with analytic inverses are called biholomorphisms (some call them analytic isomorphisms).

The injectivity of $f$ implies $f(z) - w$ has a unique zero, say $z_0$. Since $f$ is analytic, $f(z) - w$ has no poles. Furthermore, $f'(z)$ equals the derivative of $f(z) - w$. So by the generalized argument principle, your integral equals $z_0$, which is $f^{-1}(w)$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K