Compton Scattering: K, Wavelength Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculations related to Compton scattering, specifically the relationship between the final wavelength of a photon and the kinetic energy of an electron. Initial calculations provided a wavelength of 6.5 nm, but further analysis revealed an error in the relation, leading to the correct final wavelength of 1.39 x 10^-10 m. The relationship between the initial energy of the photon, final energy, and kinetic energy of the electron is clarified as E = E' + K. The thread concludes with the participant expressing gratitude for resolving the confusion.
Benlaww
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A photon with wavelength 0.1365 nm scatters from an electron that is initially at rest. What must be the angle between the direction of propagation of the incident and scattered photons if the speed of the electron immediately after the collision is 8.20×106 m/s?
Relevant Equations
K=1/2 *m*v^2
E=hc/(wl)
(wl)' = (wl) + (h/mc)(1-cos(theta))
K= 1/2 (9.11*10^-31)(8.2*^6)^2
(wl)' = hc/k = 6.5 nm
(wl)' - (wl) = 6.36 nm
cos(theta) = 1- (((6.36nm)(9.11*10^-31)(3*10^8))/(6.63*10^-34)) = -2620.7

theta = error
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benlaww said:
(wl)' = hc/k
This is not the correct relation between the final wavelength of the photon and the final kinetic energy of the electron. Let E = initial energy of the photon, E' = the final energy of the photon, and K = the final kinetic energy of the electron. How are E, E', and K related?
 
E = E' + K
Ahh I've figured it out now, I got my final wavelength as 1.39*10^-10 m. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TSny
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top