Compute lower and upper sum for Riemann integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the lower and upper sums for the Riemann integral of the function f(x) = x² over the interval [-2, 2] with n = 2. Participants are examining the values of the function at specific points and how these contribute to the sums.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the upper and lower sums by dividing the interval and identifying maximum and minimum values of the function on each subinterval. Some participants question the calculations and the interpretation of the difference between the sums.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the calculations and clarifying the interpretation of the difference between the upper and lower sums. There is recognition of a potential typo in the original calculations, and some participants are exploring the implications of this on the results.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of homework guidelines indicating that the difference between the lower and upper sums should be a specific value, which is a point of confusion for the original poster.

rayman123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let f(x)=x^2 Calculate upper sum and lower sum on the interval [-2,2] when n=2

The Attempt at a Solution


since n=2 I divide the interval into
[-2,0]\cup[0,2]

then on the interval [-2,0] the function f(x)=x^2 has the highest valute at x=-2, f(-2)=4=M_{0} and the lowest value is at x=0, f(0)=0=m_{0}

on the interval the situation is the same x=0, f(0)=0=m_{1}<br />(again the lowest value) ,and at x=2, f(2)=4=M_{1}(the highest value)

thus upper sum will be
S_{n}=M_{0}\cdot \Delta x+M_{1}\cdot \Delta x where \Delta x=2
S_{n}=4\cdot 2+4\cdot 2=16
lower sum
s_{n}=0\cdot 2+0\cdot 2=0
and here I am a bit confused cause in my homework it says'' if you calculated correctly then the difference between lower sum and upper sum should be 16'' well here it would not work...where do I make mistake?

any help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rayman123 said:
4\cdot 2+4\cdot 2=8

This does not look correct...
 
micromass said:
This does not look correct...
it should be 16, it was a typo but this still does not show me the error
 
Isn't the difference between the lower sum and the upper sum 16 now??
 
the difference is s_{n}-S_{n}=-16
 
Yeah, of course since S_n is always larger than s_n.

But with difference, they don't literally mean s_n-S_n here. Rather, they mean something like |s_n-S_n|.
 
thank you :) now I see
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K