Computer Science vs. CDS (Computing for Scientists)?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a second-year physics student should take Computer Science (CS) classes or a Computing for Scientists (CDS) course. The student acknowledges the importance of programming skills for research and industry but questions the necessity of a formal course, believing that programming can be self-taught. There is a focus on the content of the CDS course, which includes practical applications like scientific problem-solving, data analysis, and effective communication. The student finds the course potentially beneficial, suggesting it may provide valuable skills for future academic and professional endeavors. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the relevance of programming in science and the practical benefits of the CDS course.
kkefalas
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'll be a 2nd year physics student next year, and my question is should I start taking some CS classes or take CDS (Computing for Scientists)? I've heard programming is very useful for someone trying to get into research or industry, but Computing for Scientists looks obviously useful as well.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I feel as though the later will require programming skills, which in my humble opinion can be obtained without taking a course. It may be easier to pace things out but I'm a decent programmer and I've never taken a course.
 
What topics does your Computing for Scientists course cover? I don't think they're standardized as much as, say, first year intro physics, so it's hard to say how useful a particular course is, just from the title.
 
jtbell said:
What topics does your Computing for Scientists course cover? I don't think they're standardized as much as, say, first year intro physics, so it's hard to say how useful a particular course is, just from the title.

From the college's website:
"Covers use of computers to solve practical scientific problems. Topics include creating effective scientific presentations, analysis of experimental data, online literature, data/information ethics, scientific modeling, and communication/collaboration tools. Designed to equip students with the knowledge and confidence they need to use future hardware and software systems both as a student and throughout their scientific career."
sounds very useful I think I may stick with it
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
809
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K