COMSOL : damped vibration analysis of a cantilevered beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the damped vibration analysis of a cantilevered beam using COMSOL Multiphysics. The user reports that even when selecting "no damping" in the subdomain settings, the results indicate damped vibrations, suggesting a potential bug or misunderstanding of the damping settings. The conversation highlights the importance of initial conditions and the effects of stiffness on the results, as well as the implications of using weak constraints in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • COMSOL Multiphysics software familiarity
  • Understanding of cantilever beam dynamics
  • Knowledge of damping types, specifically Rayleigh damping
  • Basic principles of vibration analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the COMSOL Multiphysics modeling guide on damping options
  • Investigate the effects of initial conditions on vibration analysis
  • Experiment with different constraint settings in COMSOL
  • Learn about the implications of stiffness in dynamic simulations
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, simulation analysts, and researchers involved in vibration analysis and dynamic modeling using COMSOL Multiphysics.

incensus
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi..
I'm trying to do the damped vibration analysis of a cantilevered beam. Although i am choosing no damping in subdomain settings menu, it solves the problem as if the material is damped (the result is a damped vibration signal).
Is this is a bug or am i missing something?
Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It must be taking the stiffness of the beam into consideration. I believe the damping option is for a specific type of damping ( modeling wise ) You can probably find out more on the damping option from the modeling guide.

The initial conditions probably play a role as well. Is there an initial displacement, or a wave input?
 
Hi Nick;
There are two damping options : No damping and Rayleigh damping.. I choose "no damping". I know that Rayleigh damping is the combination of mass and stiffness but i don't choose it.

There is no initial displacement or any wave input. Only a force input(which is almost a impulse function) on one of the free boundaries.

There is another interesting point that if i choose "Weak Constraints : OFF", the results become very 'absurd'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K