COMSOL: Newton's Iteration reached - Stress testing sensor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a sensor model in COMSOL experiencing convergence issues during analysis. Attempts to resolve the problem included increasing iterations, refining the mesh, and conducting parametric studies, but the error persists, particularly with a MUMPS out-of-core warning. The model uses a hyperelastic material for the block beneath the sensors, which complicates convergence when nonlinearity is enabled. Recommendations include avoiding contact definitions until the analysis stabilizes and possibly adjusting the hyperelastic model or load conditions. The source of material constants for the hyperelastic model is also questioned for further troubleshooting.
uppityd
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
It is a sensor with a fixed surface and a prescribed displacement on the opposite

To remove this message error,

I have tried to
  1. Increase iterations
  2. Refined mesh
  3. Applied parametric studies
  4. And some other ideas from forums
However it still cannot be solved

It also has a warning of MUMPS out of core
 

Attachments

  • sensor.PNG
    sensor.PNG
    16.9 KB · Views: 135
Engineering news on Phys.org
How are these parts connected ? Do you use contact in this analysis ?
 
FEAnalyst said:
How are these parts connected ? Do you use contact in this analysis ?
They are joined using form union, i would like to put contact between the sensors together in later.
 
uppityd said:
They are joined using form union, i would like to put contact between the sensors together in later.
Right, it’s better to avoid contact until the analysis converges with Form Union. Especially that contact in Comsol is very susceptible to convergence difficulties.

Contact is not used here but there are other forma of nonlinearity in this model, right ? Do you have the geometric nonlinearity enabled ? What about the material model - which one do you use ?
 
FEAnalyst said:
Right, it’s better to avoid contact until the analysis converges with Form Union. Especially that contact in Comsol is very susceptible to convergence difficulties.

Contact is not used here but there are other forma of nonlinearity in this model, right ? Do you have the geometric nonlinearity enabled ? What about the material model - which one do you use ?
Sorry, I should have specified a lot better.

The main reason is that the block underneath the spherical disks is a hyperelastic material. If the whole model were to be set as a linear material then it converges, however when set as a hyperelastic material, the block underneath, then it does not.Non linearity is enabled.
 
The hyperelastic material might be unstable in a given strain range. Try with a lower load and maybe a different hyperelastic model. What is the source of data for material constants in this case ?
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top