Concentration of water vs. equilibrium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around the concentration of water in equilibrium reactions, particularly in the context of calculating dissociation constants. Participants explore the implications of using different concentrations of water in these calculations, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of chemical equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the molar concentration of pure water is 55.5 moles/Liter but questions why it is treated as 1 M in equilibrium calculations.
  • Another participant argues that the equilibrium constant involves the ratio of a substance's concentration to a standard concentration, suggesting that for diluted solutions, the standard state for water can be approximated as 1 mol/L.
  • A later reply clarifies that in dilute solutions, the concentration of water is approximately equal to its standard concentration, allowing for simplifications in calculations.
  • One participant presents two interpretations regarding the concentration of water in a specific reaction involving H2O and CO2, seeking clarification on which interpretation is correct.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the equilibrium constant is dimensionless and depends on the ratios of concentrations to their standard states, providing a specific formula for a reaction involving H2O and CO2.
  • There is a question raised about the validity of approximating the concentration of water as 1 M when it is actually 55.5 M in the denominator of the equilibrium expression.
  • One participant asserts that the concentration of water in a solution remains close to its standard concentration, allowing for the ratio to be considered as 1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of water's concentration in equilibrium calculations. While some agree on the approximation of water's concentration as 1 M in dilute solutions, others question the validity of this simplification, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the standard state and concentration ratios in equilibrium calculations, but there are unresolved questions regarding the implications of these approximations in specific contexts.

christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
Hi,
I understand from calculation that the molar concentration of Pure water is 55.5 moles/Liter
Then how come in equilibrium reactions when calculation the dissociation constant, we say that the concentration of water is 1 Molar? This seems like a huge difference to me? What is it I need to understand here?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
christian0710 said:
Then how come in equilibrium reactions when calculation the dissociation constant, we say that the concentration of water is 1 Molar?
This is not correct.
What enters the equilibrium constant is the ratio of the concentration of a substance c relative to some standard concentration ##c_0##, i.e. ##c/c_0##. For diluted substances this standard concentration is ##c_0=##1 mol/l (molarity) or 1 mol/ kg (molality) or the like (or more precisely the behaviour at infinite dilution extrapolated to a concentration of 1 mol/l). For solvents etc. we use as a standard state the pure substance, i.e. ##c_0=55,5## mol/l for water. In a dilute solution, the concentration ##c## of water is to an excellent extent equal to ##c_0## so that we can set the ratio equal to 1, at least for calculations with chemical precision.
 
DrDu said:
This is not correct.
What enters the equilibrium constant is the ratio of the concentration of a substance c relative to some standard concentration ##c_0##, i.e. ##c/c_0##. For diluted substances this standard concentration is ##c_0=##1 mol/l (molarity) or 1 mol/ kg (molality) or the like (or more precisely the behaviour at infinite dilution extrapolated to a concentration of 1 mol/l). For solvents etc. we use as a standard state the pure substance, i.e. ##c_0=55,5## mol/l for water. In a dilute solution, the concentration ##c## of water is to an excellent extent equal to ##c_0## so that we can set the ratio equal to 1, at least for calculations with chemical precision.

Okay, so I might understand what you are saying in 2 possible ways, which of the following two ways is the correct?

So if we are measuring the equilibrium H2O + CO2 ⇔ H(+) + HCO3(-) which is a reaction taking place in the blood of a person, then the concentration of water is only 1Molar because a) we have a diluted solution, where water is the solvent so [H2O] =1M ?
or b) the ratio between the initial concentration of water and final concentration ( at products) is almost the same so the ratio between the two concentrations is 1?
 
The equilibrium constant is a dimensionless quantity as it only depends on the ratios of concentrations to their respective standard concentrations.
Specifically for your reaction

## K=(c_\mathrm{H^+}/1\mathrm{ mol/l})\cdot (c_\mathrm{HCO_3^-}/1\mathrm{ mol/l})/[(c_\mathrm{H_2O}/ 55,5\mathrm{ mol/l})\cdot (c_\mathrm{CO_2}/1\mathrm{ mol/l})]\approx (c_\mathrm{H^+}/1\mathrm{ mol/l})\cdot (c_\mathrm{HCO_3^-}/1\mathrm{ mol/l})/(c_\mathrm{CO_2}/1\mathrm{ mol/l})
##
 
That's exactly the part I don't understand: so you have 55.5M H2O in the denominator in your equation (which makes the fraction 55 times as small) and then you can say it's approximately the same as "≈" removing the 55.5M H2O? How come we can just do that?
 
The point is that c is to a very good approximation equal to c_0. So their ratio is 1.
E.g. the concentration of water in a solution of CO2 containing 1 mol/l is still about c=(55,5-1) mol/l=54,5 mol/l, hence it differs very little from c_0
 
PErfect, so the ratio between [H2O]_Start and [H2O]end is 1 :)
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K