Conceptual question - relative accleration of rigid bodies

Answers and Replies

  • #2
267
10
To my knowledge, link AB should only have a normal component of acceleration. Whereas, link BD could have a combination of both normal and tangential. Also, point P will only a tangential acceleration.

Even though link AB has constant angular velocity, doesn't mean that BD will also have constant angular velocity. As if you were to do the relative velocity diagram of this problem you'd notice that there is both translation and rotation of link BD.
 
  • #3
To my knowledge, link AB should only have a normal component of acceleration. Whereas, link BD could have a combination of both normal and tangential. Also, point P will only a tangential acceleration.

Even though link AB has constant angular velocity, doesn't mean that BD will also have constant angular velocity. As if you were to do the relative velocity diagram of this problem you'd notice that there is both translation and rotation of link BD.
Hmm, so if I have theta=0, AB and BD are both going straight up and D is at its highest point, what happens then? The normal acceleration in AB doesn't change, but then the acceleration of BD would be (alpha x rBD) + w x (w x rBD). So the tangential acceleration would be k x j = i. Then the normal would be j x k = i, k x i =j? I think I get it now.
 

Related Threads on Conceptual question - relative accleration of rigid bodies

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
773
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
365
Replies
1
Views
608
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
18K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top