Conceptual question - relative accleration of rigid bodies

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Sirsh
267
10
To my knowledge, link AB should only have a normal component of acceleration. Whereas, link BD could have a combination of both normal and tangential. Also, point P will only a tangential acceleration.

Even though link AB has constant angular velocity, doesn't mean that BD will also have constant angular velocity. As if you were to do the relative velocity diagram of this problem you'd notice that there is both translation and rotation of link BD.
 
  • #3
prettydumbguy
17
0
To my knowledge, link AB should only have a normal component of acceleration. Whereas, link BD could have a combination of both normal and tangential. Also, point P will only a tangential acceleration.

Even though link AB has constant angular velocity, doesn't mean that BD will also have constant angular velocity. As if you were to do the relative velocity diagram of this problem you'd notice that there is both translation and rotation of link BD.

Hmm, so if I have theta=0, AB and BD are both going straight up and D is at its highest point, what happens then? The normal acceleration in AB doesn't change, but then the acceleration of BD would be (alpha x rBD) + w x (w x rBD). So the tangential acceleration would be k x j = i. Then the normal would be j x k = i, k x i =j? I think I get it now.
 

Suggested for: Conceptual question - relative accleration of rigid bodies

Replies
2
Views
917
Replies
1
Views
834
Replies
25
Views
662
Replies
8
Views
753
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
638
Replies
7
Views
456
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
377
Top