I Angular momentum of an atom within a rigid body in motion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the angular momentum of an electron in an atom changes when the atom is part of a rigid body in motion. It is argued that the electron's speed remains invariant regardless of the body's motion, as its state is typically described relative to the nucleus. The angular momentum, defined in non-relativistic quantum mechanics, does not depend on the nucleus's motion, but the electron's wave function must account for the atom's motion. The conversation highlights the necessity of using a more complex dynamical model for atoms in motion, particularly at relativistic speeds. Ultimately, the rigid body concept is deemed insufficient for accurately describing atomic behavior in motion.
  • #61
james fairclear said:
The discrepancy between the clock on the ground and the clock on the aircraft can only be explained by the relative motion between the clocks as that was the only material difference between the 2 clocks in the experiment.
No, the relative motion was not the only material difference. The different clocks took different paths through spacetime; that is the material difference. The relative motion is one side effect of that, but not the only one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Nugatory said:
You will no longer be able to post into this thread.
Which, since he was the OP of the thread, means the thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K