Condensed Matter PhD Program Choice - Advice Needed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for choosing between two PhD programs in experimental condensed matter physics, specifically at a Max Planck Graduate Centre focusing on Weyl semi-metals and at Oxford University focusing on superconductors. Participants explore factors influencing the choice, including personal interests, program environments, and potential future plans.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • OP expresses excitement about the opportunity at the Max Planck Graduate Centre but has concerns about potential chemistry content in the program.
  • OP finds the project at Oxford interesting but is wary of the atmosphere based on hearsay.
  • One participant suggests that the choice should focus more on the PhD advisor and research group rather than the institution itself.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of having virtual meetings with potential supervisors and current students to gauge the environment at each institute.
  • There is a suggestion that the decision should align with personal interests and where the "spark" lies for the OP.
  • OP inquires about the implications of their country of origin and future residency plans on their decision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which program is preferable, as opinions vary on the importance of the institution versus the advisor and the nature of the research topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the subjective nature of the decision and the importance of personal preferences, indicating that there may be no universally correct choice.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective PhD students in condensed matter physics or related fields considering program choices and seeking advice on decision-making processes.

Feyel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I don't want to be too specific here, but specific enough for relevant advice.

I'm finishing a Masters in Physics and am lucky to have been made offers by 2 excellent institutes: a Max Planck Graduate Centre (MP), and at Oxford UK. Both are in experimental condensed matter; Weyl semi-metals at MP, superconductors at Oxford.

MP would be exciting as I have never lived in Germany - I worry that I would regret not taking the opportunity to go, and I like topology so Weyl semi-metals would be interesting, and they seem to be a growing field. On the other hand, I am concerned that there might be more chemistry than I would like, as it is a chemistry/physics institute. The project at Oxford also is really interesting - superconductivity has always interested me, but I figure I shouldn't limit myself to considering only SC when there are so many interesting topics in condensed matter. And also, from what I have heard even at postgrad the atmosphere in Oxford might not be great.

I am really struggling to decide between the two, as both are amazing opportunities and I would enjoy the Physics in both. Any advice would be much appreciated! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you talked to people from each institute yet?

In an ideal world, I'd recommend visiting each one, but given the current state of the world, I realize that's not really feasible. You might contact each department to see if they at least have some kind of virtual tour for prospective students. See if it's possible to schedule a virtual meeting with potential supervisors and maybe some current graduate students to get a feel for each place.
 
It’s less about the place and more about your Ph.D. advisor/group. Also, given that you already have a masters, you should consider the program requirement differences between the two.

Also ask yourself why you consider one of the topics limiting and the other not. A successful degree is usually a deep dive. Younger scientists tend to get hung up over academic boundaries. In reality, you want an interesting physics problem and physics problems do not see these boundaries

At the end of the day, the question is about you. What works for someone else might not work for you.

Also be aware that there might not be a correct path, only different paths.
 
Last edited:
I've recommended the students I mentor to have virtual meetings with as many potential research advisers as possible and attend the virtual lab tours and stuff of that sort. Once all the homework is done and the choice is to be made, my advice is to follow your heart. Where is the spark? I mean the biggest spark.
 
OP: What country are you from? Do you have any plans as to which country you would settle in after you have completed your academic training? Or is that totally open?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K