MHB Condition Number of sum of Matrices

Abbas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
As far as I know there is no explicit formulas but is this true? I've tested it in Matlab with random matrices and It seems true!
cond(A+B) =< cond(A) + cond(B)
Where can I find a proof for this hypothesis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like Serena said:
Welcome to MHB, Abbas! :)

\begin{aligned}
\text{cond}(A+B)
&= ||(A+B)^{-1}|| \cdot ||A+B|| \\
&= ||A^{-1} + B^{-1}||\cdot ||A+B|| \\
&\le \Big(||A^{-1}||+||B^{-1}||\Big) \cdot \Big(||A||+||B||\Big) \\
&\le ||A^{-1}||\cdot||A|| + ||B^{-1}||\cdot||B|| \\
&= \text{cond}(A) + \text{cond}(B)
\end{aligned}

Thanks, but Are you sure if this is true?
I doubt (A+B)-1= A-1+B-1.
How about ||A-1||⋅||B||+||A||⋅||B-1|| ? can these terms be omitted?
 
Abbas said:
Thanks, but Are you sure if this is true?
I doubt (A+B)-1= A-1+B-1.
How about ||A-1||⋅||B||+||A||⋅||B-1|| ? can these terms be omitted?

You're quite right. I had just deleted my post, since I realized it was not correct due to the very reasons you mention.
 
I like Serena said:
You're quite right. I had just deleted my post, since I realized it was not correct due to the very reasons you mention.

I was looking for an answer since I post it here, cond(A+B) =< cond(A) + cond(B) is not always true. the hypothesis is wrong. Thanks BTW. :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top