Conditional Probability, Additive Signals

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the conditional density function of a signal transmitted through an additive Gaussian noise channel. The signal, represented by the random variable X with a specific density function, is combined with independent Gaussian noise Y, which has a mean of 0 and a variance of 4. Participants express confusion about the convolution process and the steps needed to derive the conditional cumulative distribution function. The approach involves calculating the distribution of the output signal Z, which is the sum of X and Y, and then using this to find the conditional distribution of X given Z. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the joint distribution and the conditional distribution in this context.
Anthony45802
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A signal, X, is a random variable with the following density function:
<br /> f_{X}(x) = \begin{cases}<br /> \frac{3}{25}(x-5)^2, &amp; 0 \le x \le 5\\<br /> 0, &amp; otherwise<br /> \end{cases}<br />

The signal is transmitted through an additive Gaussian noise channel, where the Gaussian noise has a mean of 0 and a variance of 4. The signal and noise are independent.

Find an expression for the conditional density function of the signal, given the observation of the output.

Obviously, this is a homework assignment, so I don't want it done for me; however, I am confused. Perhaps I am just confused by the problem or the wording, but I am totally stuck on what to do.

I believe the output signal should be a convolution where Z = X + Y, and Y is the gaussian(0, 2). After I solve the convolution and receive Z, I don't know what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that you need to solve for the conditional cumulative distribution F(w,y) = P(X + Y \le w | Y = y) = P(X \le w - y | Y = y). Then differentiate with respect to w to get the density. (I think you interpreted "gaussian noise channel" correctly in the context of the problem, but I think it has an interpretation as a continuous stochastic process in other contexts.)
 
Last edited:
If g(X,Y) is joint density of the convolution X + Y, can you set Y = y and integrate symbolically with respect to X from minus infinity to w-y to obtain P(X \le w -y| Y = y)? (I haven't worked the details out, so I don't know.)
 
If output (Z)= noise(Y) + signal (X) then the following is the working principle:
Find the distribution of Z.
Then from the joint distribution Z and X find the distribution X|Z.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K