MHB Confidence interval of difference

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :giggle:

From two populations of small and medium enterprises, we collect two random and independent samples of size $n_1 = 64$ and $n_2 = 36$ enterprises respectively. If we calculate for the companies of the first sample average sales of $9$ thousand euros and a variation of $4$, while for the companies of the second sample average sales of $7$ thousand euros and a variation of $9$ and in addition we assume unequal population variances, then

a) estimate a confidence interval with a probability of $95\%$ of the population sales difference

b) what sample size should we consider when the second population to construct a $95\%$ confidence interval for estimating the population average sales amount, with a sampling error of $0.6$ thousand euros, if we know that the random sales variables $X\sim N (8,4 )$.I have done the following :

a) We have that $$\overline{x}-\overline{y}=9-7=2$$ and $$s_{\bar{x}-\bar{y}}\approx \sqrt{\frac{s_x^2}{n_x}+\frac{s_y^2}{n_y}}=\sqrt{\frac{4}{64}+\frac{9}{36}}=\sqrt{\frac{5}{16}}=\frac{\sqrt{5}}{4}$$
Since $C=95\%$ then $z^{\star}=1.96$ and then the confidence intervalis $$\left ( 2-1.96\cdot \frac{\sqrt{5}}{4}, 2+1.96\cdot \frac{\sqrt{5}}{4}\right )$$ Is that correct?

b) Could you give me a hint?
:unsure:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey mathmari!

It says 9 thousand euros with a variation of 4.
That is a bit confusing and ambiguous.
Is it a variance? Or is it a standard deviation?
And what its unit? Is it thousands of euros?

If we assume a standard deviation of 4 thousand euros is intended, then we have $s_1=4$ instead of $s_1^2=4$. :unsure:

For b we presumably have $\mu=8$ and $\sigma=4$.
If I'm not mistaken, they are asking for an n such that the the margin of error of the confidence interval is 0.6.
That error is 1.96 SE, where SE is the so called standard error.
It is $SE=\frac \sigma{\sqrt n}$. 🤔
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top